The Gestalt Principle: Design Theory for Web Designers
basix

The Gestalt Principle: Design Theory for Web Designers

This entry is part 6 of 15 in the Web Design Theory Session
« PreviousNext »

The way that people see our designs strongly effects the meaning that they take away from them. The Gestalt Principle examines this phenomena; As such, it’s one of the fundamental principles that each and every web designer should consider when moving through the design process. We’ll also examine how understanding gestalt will improve your own workflow!


Design Theory and Web Design

Trying to come up with a good and creative design may seem easy for someone who has attended a design school, but for the 90% of web designers out there who never attended any design course or school coming mostly from either development or generally non-design backgrounds. The question still remains… what really defines a good web design? Is it just talent? A person who possesses some kind of “special” eye that knows what works out and what doesn’t? Or is there logic and scientific methodology behind all of this that can guide designers, critics and even clients into coming up with a great design.

This is part of a series of design-theory articles that will guide you through the basic principles of the design process. We’ll be focusing on the most important fundamental ideas that can make great differences in the final design.


The Gestalt Principle

Gestalt is a German word meaning “essence or shape of an entity’s complete form”, and this single definition may be one of the most important rules of design.

More often than not, designers tend to focus on the web design’s details rather than the overall look. They focus on curved edges, shadows, fonts…etc. all that is good but may not really make any difference if the client doesn’t like the design at first glance, what most people don’t understand is that the brain first sees the overall shape of any design, then starts to focus on and see the details…

Take a look at this example image…

At a first glance you would see a couple of old people’s heads, but looking more closely you start to see the details (which some people may not even notice at first) that make up these images and you start to see a totally different image.

Now let’s try something to see how details really do not matter, take a look at these 2 examples:

At first glance these 2 images may seem identical; however there are 5 subtle differences in the details that have very little impact on the whole “design”

1. The black bird at the top left s looking the opposite direction
2. The man on the left’s sombrero (hat) is different
3. The man’s walking stick is flipped and a bit darker
4. The pavement bricks on the bottom right are larger in the 2nd image
5. The woman is looking in the opposite direction

Now none of these changes really had any impact on the overall look of the image… let us see another common example:

These are 2 versions of the Volkswagen Beetle, the 1937 and the 1973 models, and despite several major changes in the design details over 4 decades, the design essentially remains the same. This is due to the way our brains work, we see whole pictures and define the whole form much faster and easier than seeing or noticing changes in details.

If we look at the above image which depicts a Dalmatian dog sniffing the ground in the shade of overhanging trees. The dog is not recognized by first identifying its parts (feet, ears, nose, tail, etc.), and then inferring the dog from those component parts. Instead, the dog is perceived as a whole, all at once.

The same happens to every single website design we create, the design is never perceived by identifying its parts (Header, Navigation, Content, buttons, tabs…etc.), the design is perceived as a whole at first glance.

When I was back in college, one of my professors summed up this in a simple sentence, he said “if you see a design, like it, then decide to work on adjusting details, then you know it’s a good design, however if you start to adjust first to try to make yourself like it… then you know it’s a bad design… don’t waste your time trying to fix it… just change it as a whole”, this professor understood the magic key in any design… we see things as a whole, not as the sum of its parts.

Ask anyone in the world to draw Big Ben or the Eiffel Tower or the Giza Pyramids… they would all agree on the overall shape of each landmark, because however differently we may see these landmarks (visiting, in photos, in a movie, in a travel brochure …etc.) we all see the same defining shape.


Applying the Gestalt Principle to the Web Design Workflow

Below are a few web examples and their respective layout silhouettes. The silhouette view is what the brain identifies as the page shape. Trying to change anything other than the main shape will result, more or less, in the same design… and going back to your client with the same design after they’ve requested changes will make the client feel that nothing has been done.

…the design will look the same until you’ve changes the structural gestalt.

You’ll be surprised at how many designers make this mistake and wonder why the client still hates a design or feel nothing has been changed or added, even though they’ve worked tirelessly on improving the individual elements.

Alright, let’s peek at a few designs and their silhouettes:

Usually, sticking to the safe and generally square-like design (as in the 4 bottom layouts from the examples above) will result in an ordinary design, nothing very creative. Try to always experiment with the “containing shell” of your design. Try rotating the box a few degrees or cutting out and changing one of the corners… all of this adds to your design’s uniqueness and creativity.

You should always start with the container, or the overall structural shell of a design; Forget the details and individual components for now.

When that is done and you and the client are satisfied with the structure, grab your wireframes and start working on the details. You will be surprised at how many times a design ends up as a neatly colored wireframe when you start from the inside out. I’ve seen several designers working on the header and navigation first, then start laying out the components, and before you know it you have a neatly packed and nicely colored page full of content which may be from a usability perspective well placed and correct, however from a design perspective it would never be creative or stand out.

Think of your design as a chocolate covered peanut, if you start with the peanut, from the inside out, the outer layer which everyone sees (the chocolate layer) will always depend on the peanut shape and you will have little control on the result.

However if you treat your design like a chocolate egg, working on the outer layer first, and shape it as you desire – fitting your inner content to match the shell, then it really doesn’t matter what you fill it with, the design will always be the egg-shape that you intended.

Note: Want to add some source code? Type <pre><code> before it and </code></pre> after it. Find out more
  • Filipe Carrano Pacheco

    Good article. Helps me a lot to understand better why they always ask me to do so many thumbnails on the design school.

    • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

      Thanks for the comment Filipe!

  • http://www.lastrose.com LastRose

    Great Article. I usually start with wireframes anyways, but I never though of it like that and it really makes me look at things in a new light. Any chances a good wireframing article be coming up soon?

    • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

      Sure! I’d be glad to put together a couple tutorials on wireframing in the next month :)

  • http://ccpmultimedia.com Connor Crosby

    Excellent article! I am one who struggles with design. I’d rather take a design and code it than start from scratch.

  • Jeff

    great article, can’t wait for the others in the series!

  • http://www.darlingstewie.com Darling Stewie

    Very interesting article! I can never start with wireframes but instead usually start with the colors and everything right up front… But the design in the beginning and the end usually look nothing alike! I’ve gotten good feedback on my web designs but I am sure I design in a very backwards way.

    I should consider using this gestalt principle and work with wireframes more… I might make better designs :P

    • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

      Thanks for the comment Darling – I can relate with you – when I’m in a rush, I usually start a design by rushing straight into the details (like color, logo, etc.). The funny thing is, most of the projects that start this way end up looking similar with one another. It’s when I start from scratch and really hammer the wireframe out that I start to get interesting results. Anyways, great comment :)

  • http://www.brettjankord.com/ Brett

    Nice article Ahmed. It really helped me understand not to worry about the little details so much until I have a basic overall structure that I like.

    • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

      Yep – You can always polish a great foundational layout… but there’s a reason people use the saying “lipstick on a pig” – it’s often harder to fix a bad layout than just starting out with a great foundation.

  • http://newdynamicmedia.com/ Oksana

    Thanks, very nice article. Picture of old people’s heads reminded me of school :) when my teacher would say “what do you see first when you look at it?” Everything starts from basics.

  • http://www.youfounderic.com Eric

    The article is great and everything but what I really want to know is where I can find one of those delicious chocolate eggs!

    • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

      LOL – I’ve gotta admit, the first time I reviewed this article for Ahmed, I thought the same exact thing ;)

      • Michael Rose

        Hotel Chocolate :)

  • Turbronater

    This was a seriously well thought out post on web design theory. I am not much of a designer, but will take these “great ideas” and use them in my work. I like the idea of designing from the outside in, that is where I have been making my mistake. I did learn a while back in high school to work on the “whole painting” and not just a single part, that thought really applies a lot to this article, thanks and keep up the super sweet useful posts.

  • sam

    Awesome article. It helps a lot. I also think this principle can be applied to many areas of design. Thank you.

  • Marcus

    Great principle to know. I haven’t thought about webdesign in this way earlier. I’m one of those who usually start off somewhat in the middle. I can do top part of the shape, then fill it with content, then work my way to the bottom. I’m a bit mixed.

    However, I didn’t like that you missed the conclusion in the article. What’s your point? Why should we care about the shape? What’s a good shape and what’s a bad one? All I got out of this is that Yes, you look at the website as a whole at first glance, and this is the reason why clients might believe it’s the “same” website even though you changed a lot of the details and content.

    What’s a good shape? What’s a bad one?

    By using my own conclusions I could think off a masculine or a feminin design. You usually try to include round shapes when designing a website for females. This makes me believe that these shapes doesnt matter that much if they are included in the content or not, but more as a “whole” part of the canvas/layout.

    Example: A square website with rounded corners are probably more attractive to a feminin group then a square website with hard edges but round circled content-boxes.

    • Ahmed Hussam
      Author

      Hi Marcus,

      Thanks for your feedback, this article is part of a series of articles, you you can consider it an “unfinished” topic, and I’ll go into more details in the future articles :)

    • http://www.xpellshop.com ric

      the conclusion is to get a silhouette you like, first.
      good or bad design depends on what you like, or the customer, added to the more technical part of layout.

    • matias

      Good design is all about making other designers feel like idiots because that idea wasn’t theirs. =P
      Frank Chimero

  • eeean

    Some very good info and metaphors in the beginning, however…

    There is a massive contradiction between the start of the article, getting the underlying content placement right first, then the end of the article talks about working from the outside inwards and fitting the content to the layout.

    Make up your mind? It doesn’t make sense.

    Furthermore, content is more important than the ‘shell’ of a design. The egg / peanut metaphor is wonky because you attribute the end result as the shell, but also the foundation as the shell. Which is it?

    • Ahmed Hussam
      Author

      Hi eeean,

      I don’t see any contradiction actually, I never said content is more important (in terms of design).
      Note that I’m not saying COntent or Usability is not important, what I’m saying is that it is not important for a design to be great or WOW. What I usually see in practical world is people take too much care of content that it actually becomes a neatly packed and colored content site instead of a cool designed site.

      Usually people forget that a design should be made first and in parallel to any usability research or wireframes, then they should be merged together. no one side should take importance over the other to have a well balanced design, if the design takes higher importance it will usually be at the expense of usability and performance, however if content takes higher importance, you will never have a cool design… the key is balance :)

  • kankaro

    great article of web design theory… i struggle to create a simple yet neatly design of the web.

  • Dj Thompson

    Great article. Now I have a more clear understanding of why my sites look the same!

  • gaurav

    You are right about how clients doesn’t notice those little changes and still remain unsatisfied. Unfortunately i am one of those designers. But i learnt a new thing today. Thanks.

  • http://www.dharmakelleher.com Dharma Kelleher

    Thanks for this post, Brandon. I found it very helpful and useful in how I approach designs.

  • http://newarts.at Drazen Mokic

    Nice article, recently you hear more often to focus on the rough shape of a design and not to struggle with details at the beginning, Jason Fried says this really often.

    Thanks

  • http://www.creativedesign.in Entherman

    Maybe this is why It takes me that much time to design something. I usually start designing with header and from top to bottom, never really did wireframe. And when I did, I usually change the frame completley when designing. Have to keep this in mind tho. Thanks.

    • http://www.chrismcmanus.com Chris

      I do the same thing, working from the top down. I really appreciate the effort that went into this. I found it very educational, I will come back to this often I know. My designs really suck ( imo ) so perhaps this is just the thing I needed.

  • http://www.andrebruwer.com Andre

    Brilliant article!!. Funny how things work, I’ve been struggling with this very problem for the last few days, battling through the hour trying to come up with a complete design. And now here it is, back to the drawing board all super excited and full of new ideas – this time from the outside in. AWESOME!!!

    This is most certainly a blessing. Just had to say thanks.

    • Ahmed Hussam
      Author

      Glad the article was useful to you :)

      • wilma

        am really interested in you gestalt theory, on how you incorporated this with web design..i wonder if you could add more
        wilma

  • Parul Vikram

    we normaly start a page layout in illustrator and then convert it to the dreamweaver.

  • http://www.sj777.in SJ……(sujith)

    Good article. Actually this article teach me a new lesson. This article pointed something that i didnt noticed till now.

    I expect more useful articles like this.

    Those illustration were fantastic.

    Excellnt work.

  • Fily

    Great article! I’ll be waiting for the series of this tutorial.

  • ori

    10q for the article.
    It is very interesting and inspairing.

    Shukran.

    • Ahmed Hussam
      Author

      Thanks :)

  • http://www.softwebmedia.net Mike

    Thank you for sharing this article. :)

    • Ahmed Hussam
      Author

      Glad you like it

  • NE

    This article really made me think. I found myself the day after reading this, sitting on the couch pondering about it.

    It was so clear to me how laying out the parts of the website in creative arrangements is important, and how some minute details are not worth the effort. It’s about the big picture.

    One thing, though… You said that a client might not think you made any changes if the shape is not different, but I think that a lot of times, designers who are not so good at color theory can cause a good design to look awful, and just switching the colors around can make a huge impact.

    I have had PSD files sent to me with the instruction to just change the colors because they didn’t work, and suddenly the whole thing looks better without touching the architecture.

  • NE

    I just thought about something related to this article.
    It’s about figuring out the big picture and only then worry about little things.

    It’s this metaphore that someone told me about years ago.

    Imagine you had a vase, with, let’s say, a simple cylinder shape, and you had 5 piles of rocks, ranging from huge to tiny like salt.

    Your task is to fill the vase with all of it and you’re told it’s possible.

    If you start with the salt, and then go up in size, when you get to the huge rocks, the vase will be quite full and you won’t be able to place them.

    But, if you start with the large pieces first, the smaller ones will fall in the cracks and fill in the crevices.

    It’s a good metaphore to think about when you worry about the little things in the begining.

  • Pingback: The Gestalt Principle: Design Theory for Web Designers | San Francisco Design & Technology Magazine

  • Pingback: Принципе Гештальта Теория веб-дизайна

  • Jordon

    I liked this article. This could serve as a whole lecture in college. You sir just simplified it. Nice article. If I could rate this, I would give you 5 stars out of 5.

  • http://www.logobilisim.com web tasarım fiyatları

    very good man.thank you

  • http://simonwjackson.com Simon W. Jackson

    Awesome article. Coming from a web development background its defiantly hard to start with wire framing. When ever I get inspired to design, I always want to dive right in. Unfortunately, this usually leads to (many) unfinished projects.

    Looking forward to the next article!

  • Sarunas Savickas

    That’s very good to use this principle. Thanks.

  • Rajesh Hegde

    It is an eye opener article! Wonderful illustrations. Simple yet thought provocative one.

    Thanks for sharing with us.

    • Ahmed Hussam
      Author

      Thanks Rajesh for reading, glad you like it

  • http://kaushikpanchal.com Kaushik Panchal

    Great Great article.
    Thanks a lot for sharing :-)

    • Ahmed Hussam
      Author

      Thanks for reading, glad you like it

  • Pingback: The Design Concept and Inspiration | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: Concept and Inspiration: Design Theory for Web Designers « Ahmed Hussam

  • Pingback: ART COPILOT VFX & MOTION GRAPHICS Concept and Inspiration: Design Theory for Web Designers | ART COPILOT

  • Pingback: The Gestalt Principle: Design Theory for Web Designers | Coding Articles & Tutorials

  • Jennifer

    Enjoyed immensely.

    • Ahmed Hussam
      Author

      Glad you enjoyed it Jennifer :)

  • PJ

    Awesome explanation of the theory. It helps a lot. Thx

  • http://www.movieviews.be Dennis

    Thank you for this article !
    I totally agree with the “egg example” :)

    Grtz,

    Dennis

  • http://www.sagie.es Cesar

    Thank you Brandon,

    I didn´t know about this. Now I understand why some clients say you are doing nothing when you have been working hard. It has happend to me many times, and it is very frustrating, but now there is something else we can do.

    You have been very helpful, thanks a lot :D

    Cesar

  • Artem

    Great article! Thanks you! I need it to progress in!

  • Pingback: 10 Tips for Creating Higher Selling Themes at ThemeForest | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: 10 Tips for Creating Higher Selling Themes | Shadowtek | Hosting and Design Solutions

  • Pingback: 10 Tips for Creating Higher Selling Themes | Marketing for Companies

  • Pingback: 10 Tips for Creating Higher Selling Themes | All of Cyber

  • Pingback: My Stream » 10 Tips for Creating Higher Selling Themes

  • Pingback: 10 Tips for Creating Higher Selling Themes | Jetcat

  • Pingback: 10 Tips for Creating Higher Selling Themes | Zoomfly

  • Pingback: A Graphic Design Primer, Part 3: Basics of Composition - Noupe Design Blog

  • Pingback: Sacima鲨鳍马工作室 » Blog Archive » A Graphic Design Primer, Part 3: Basics of Composition

  • Pingback: A Graphic Design Primer, Part 3: Basics of Composition | Tutorial,Download,Tips & Trick

  • Pingback: 平面设计入门[三]:作文基础 | 冯小强技术博客,Q1前端开发

  • Pingback: Web Vision Design | Web Analytics, Tutorials, jQuery, CSS, PHP, Internet Marketing and Web Development | Web Vision Design

  • Pingback: A Graphic Design Primer, Part 3: Basics of Composition - WORDPRESS4free | WORDPRESS4free

  • Srinidhi

    Very informative article

  • http://www.psyched.be/wordpress CiNiTriQs

    Applicable on more than just web design of course. good read, keep em coming!

  • Tony

    does anyone have a link to the first wireframe example? I would like to check that out.

  • Pingback: 10 Tips for Creating Higher Selling Themes - Dima Venglinkii's Portfolio

  • Pingback: The Close Relationship Between Gestalt Principles and Design | Articles | instantShift

  • Pingback: The Close Relationship Between Gestalt Principles and Design | designerbooster

  • Oscar

    I like this article. Being completely new to design I would have liked this session at the beginning of the series.

  • Pingback: Graphic Design Basics Part 3: Composition

  • Pingback: Graphic Design Basics Part 3: Composition | Free Web Design Tucson

  • Pingback: Graphic Design Basics Part 3: Composition | Css For Xhtml - cssforxhtml.com

  • Pingback: Graphic Design Basics Part 3: Composition | Free WordPress Installs

  • Pingback: Graphic Design Basics Part 3: Composition | Graphic Design

  • Pingback: Graphic Design Basics Part 3: Composition | WebDesign Terminal

  • Mariana Alvarado

    Thank you. Very well explained and illustrated.

  • Ray

    Would the structural shell be considered the wire frame ? Wasn’t sure if the images of the
    website outlines were referring to the “shell” of the design.

  • Pingback: Lesson Learned: Using Fixed-Width Layouts in SharePoint « Branding « Sharepoint « The SharePoint Muse

  • Pingback: The Gestalt Principle: Design Theory for Web Designers | Webdesigntuts+ » Web Design

  • Pingback: Lesson 11: The complete design workflow

  • Tristan Rentz

    Ahmed, this is truly illuminating! Thank you soooo much!

    • http://www.ahussam.com Ahmed Hussam
      Author

      Thank you Tristan for reading :)

  • Roland Nelson

    adds a whole new perspective to design. Thanks…

  • Pingback: 3 Tutorials On Basic Web Design Theory | HostNine Company Blog

  • Pingback: 3 Tutorials On Basic Web Design Theory | Zeetechlab Blog

  • Pingback: 15 Web Design Theory You Should Learn - ReeZh Design

  • Pingback: The Gestalt Principle: Design Theory for Web Designers | Webdesigntuts+