Future Trends: Are Browsers Becoming a Thing of the Past?

Future Trends: Are Browsers Becoming a Thing of the Past?

Let’s start by putting it right on the table: Browsers just might be an endangered species. There I said it … and before you crank up the venomous comments below, hear me out because we are in for one seriously fun ride … if you choose to strap yourself in.

To start this piece I am going to start in the last place you would expect … on a street outside a university in Beijing, China. On this particular day about 5 years ago I saw something that was foreign to my Western experience. There, parked at the curb, was a horse cart and in the back was a middle-aged Chinese lady selling watermelons. There was quite a crowd around her and I stood there idly watching commerce in its purest form. When her customers had departed she moved to the seat at the front of the wagon. She reached under the seat and pulled out the coolest cell phone I had ever seen. I was transfixed watching her use it and when she glanced up and saw me staring at her she must have wondered, “What is this crazy Westerner doing?”

When I returned to Toronto I tore the cell phone stores apart looking for her device. It wasn’t until a couple of months later that I saw it. My beloved had dragged me out to a James Bond film and “M” handed him a phone. The camera zoomed in and I am sure everyone in the audience heard: “That’s the phone!” James Bond had the phone. A lady selling watermelons in Beijing had the phone. Me? Not available.

Let’s move ahead 5 years in time to this past November. I am back in Beijing . It is late, it is dark and I flag down a cab to get back to where I am staying. When the cab starts moving the back seat lights up and I am looking at an interactive application playing on a touch screen. I am transfixed because I hadn’t seen anything like this before. In fact I pulled out my Flip video recorder and recorded myself interacting with the screen.  I am sure the driver looked in the rear view mirror; saw me with a video recorder pointing at the screen and thought, “What is this crazy Westerner doing?”


Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player


Becoming Unplugged

You are probably wondering what do a watermelon seller and a taxi have to do with the impending death of the browser?

In fact they have everything to do with it. Sometimes we are so close to the technology and the changes that we don’t step back to see how far we have come and … where we are heading. Sometimes a stark contrast is what we need to bring clarity to events.

What has happened is simple: We have become unplugged. Our work is not tethered to an Ethernet cable. In fact it hasn’t been for a while but it took the iPhone, Adobe and Google to weld the Ethernet port shut for all eternity.

The iPhone turned the device market inside out and rearranged its molecules. Adobe’s Flash Player 10.2 and AIR technologies finally removed the Interactive Tower of Babel that was mobile interactivity. Google’s Android OS gave the market a standard Open Source OS that, according to Google, will soon work seamlessly across all devices from smart phones to 46-inch Samsung TV’s. Though HTML 5 may be all the rage with the “cool kids” there is a simple fact of life that is being overlooked by these HTML 5 Fanboyz: There are a few hundred thousand apps out there that weren’t there when the Watermelon lady pulled her phone out from under her seat. In fact it was two years after I envied her phone, that Apple, on June 11 in 2007, announced it would allow third-party apps on the device.These apps, unlike HTML 5, don’t,for example, require 3 different browsers and 3 video formats to play a simple video. They just work.

The other aspect of apps is how they condense the information into a very neat package. In the example, below you are looking at Bing Maps in the browser and, below it,the same app prepackaged in the Blackberry Playbook. Same information , just a different, more concise, presentation of the same information.

To me, this is exactly why apps are catching on. Starting with 500 apps , Apple now claims there are over 350,000 apps available … and counting.  That’s pretty good growth over four years.

On the other side of the fence, about the time the AppStore opened for business, Google, in November 2007, dropped the Android system on the market as an alternative to the Walled Garden that was Apple’s iOS. It wasn’t until the release of Froyo (V2.2) in May of 2010 and its inclusion of Flash technology that the platform really took off.

According to research2guidance which tracks this stuff, in May of this year the Apple AppStore will have 381,062 apps while the Android Marketplace will have 294,738 apps. They predict that by this August, if trends continue, Android will overtake Apple at the 425,00 mark then kick in the afterburners and grow to over 600,000 apps by the end of this year. Apple will continue its growth- they predict Apple will end this year with about 500,00 apps – but the curve for Android, as it gains broad acceptance, curves sharply upward while Apple’s curve looks more like a slope. Which means we started this year with around 300,000 apps out there in the cloud and finish it with over a million apps and not one of them needs a browser to operate … they need nothing more than a WiFi or 3G/4G connection to do whatever it is they do … even in the back seat of a Beijing taxi.

When you really think about it, an app is nothing more than a browser-less website and we can’t seem to get enough of them. According to this infographic from shoutem, 5 billion appswere downloaded last nyear. In 2013, they claim the number will be 21 billion . If that number plays out then every living human on the planet earth will own at least four apps.

mobile app world
Brought to you by ShoutEm – Mobile App Builder

Speaking from personal experience, that number makes sense. My wife is the least technological person I know.  Turning on a PC and using email, a browser and MS Word are about it for her. Anything else and I am hauled off the couch for a rather frustrating experience trying to explain the difference between RTF and Text in email. In fact she used the PC in her home office simply to do email and on line banking. This past February she casually mentioned she really liked the iPad. This was a first for me, and so I dutifully picked her up an iPad. Since then, she hasn’t turned on the PC. Our bank, CIBC, has an “app for that” and she hasn’t flamed up “Online Banking” since. In fact she donated the PC to our son in University. All that’s left of that PC is a blue Ethernet cable on the floor under her desk.

When you look at these two interfaces that do exactly the same thing you realize the app is actually intuitive, simpler to use and easily comprehended. It is not a "dumbed down" version of the web site. It asks exactly the question my wife is expecting: What do you want to do?

For me, the first app loaded onto my iPhone4, Motorola Xoom, Blackberry Playbook, Motorola Droid and my Blackberry Torch is a Twitter app. The only time I touch Twitter in a browser is when I use my MacBook Pro.Yet, when you look at the Browser version and the app version of Twitter , it becomes apparent it’s the same app being delivered by the same network. The only difference is the absence of the browser and a reduction of clutter.

It’s the Network, Stupid

What I find fascinating about apps is that by stripping out the browser, it is the network that becomes the medium. There was a time, not that long ago, when WiFi networks were a novelty and a big draw for coffee shop business. If you troll through Twitter and other forums you will find the usual complaints about devices but the most vehement ones are usually aimed at the speed and reliability of the network or bitching about the lack of WiFi connectivity.

Today, not being able to wirelessly connect is more of a an annoyance than anything else. Our devices- smartphones, tablets, TV’s – have become extensions of ourselves and we simply assume we will always be able to access information at the time,place and through the device of our choosing. Even airlines are offering their passengers online access at 36,000 feet. In 2009, Quantcast sureveyed the mobile market and concluded that by 2013 mobile browsing will outstrip desktop browsing. Other findings included the fact that in 2009 U.S. mobile web usage grew by 110% and globally the number was even larger: 148%.

These numbers are may indicate trends. If you want to see it in action you have to head to China.

In preparing for my recent university lecture tour throughout China I stumbled across a rather fascinating look at the mobile market in that country. BBH Labs, which calls itself a Digital Marketing Skunkworks, produced a rather startling study of the Asian Mobile market which, here in the West, tends to lie below our radar. One of the major conclusions was :

"The Asian internet revolution is skipping a step, with many people accessing the web and web-powered utilities uniquely through mobile devices."

That revolution is mostly powered by the crew in the image below and they are, regardless of geographic location, a prime demographic.

If you ever get the chance to visit , you will see how true that observation really is. It is not uncommon to see people with two devices from separate carriers and the most common reason for two carriers is network speed. The other thing I noticed is that tablets, especially iPads, are increasingly visible on the street. When I was there in November of last year, the Samsung Galaxy Tab was about to be released and the vendors in Bainaohui Computer Mall in Beijing had signs for the device all over the building. I fully expected ,when I returned in May, to see Android devices and tablets.When I strode into the Lecture Halls and looked around there was not one tablet to be found. Tons of Smartphones but tablets were non existant. Yet, when I flamed up my Blackberry Playbook, Droid and Motorola Xoom during my lectures, the students were fascinated with them because it seemed to be the first time they had actually seen a tablet let alone took one out for test drive. I have bets with students all over China that by the time they graduate, 3-4 years from now, most of them will have tablets.

If you are a web design or mobile pro the numbers are astounding and point to serious business oppotunities for the astute marketer. For example there are 879,000,000 mobile subscribers (Keep in mind multiple carriers are common) in that country. To put that number in context, that number is 800 times larger than the population of my country- Canada- and 40% larger than the entire pouplation of North America. There are 303,000,000 mobile internet users in China and again, to put that number in context , that number is roughly 60% of all mobile and desktop internet users in Europe.

These users are not simplly texting eachother or browsing. . According to the BBH study, transactions onTaobao, the Chinese equivalent of eBay, totalled close to $60 billion U.S. In that same year eBay was feeling pretty good that it did $2 billion globally. What are they buying through the mobile app? According to Taobao , "The top 10 best-selling items on Taobao mobile shopping were, in descending order: mobile phone credit; women’s clothing; consumer electronics; men’s clothing; online gaming cards; skincare products; snacks and other dry food items; sports shoes and bags; car accessories; and books and magazines. These top 10 product categories made up 73 percent of all mobile shopping transactions."

All of this is taking place as the major Telcos in that country start improving the network speeds and upgrading to 4G.

In a country where mobile is huge and where apps are taking over, it was rather interesting to have the following conversation with a student studying Cloud Computing (The phrase is a "code word" for mobile app development) at Xiamen University’s Software School. He started off by complaining about the fact that he had to learn new programming languages and design skills. When he finished he seemed rather surprised that I didn’t answer him directly and, instead,asked,"Oh really? Does the client really care how you completed the project?"

The student thought about it for a second and replied, "I don’t really think so."

"If that is the case", I asked, "then what is it that the client cares about?"

He pondered my question for a few seconds and replied with a response that is universal in this business. "I think",he said," they only care that it works."

As I said, "It’s the network,stupid."

It’s also the device !

As we become untethered our work is going to appear everywhere there is a screen. That is the essence of this multiscreen universe. The problem is, contrary to common wisdom and Adobe’s claims otherwise, one does not design once and deploy everywhere. In fact the best advice I was ever given about this emerging technology was : "Design big." It is much easier to scale down than deal with the inevitable resolution issues of scaling up. This is sort of what Shaun Cronin was getting at in Death of the Fold and Connor Turnbull in The Shift.

Even though the CS5.5 versions of Flash (shown below) and Catalyst now have a a feature that allows you to scale content with the stage, moving from say a Smartphone to a Tablet or even GoogleTV is not a process the astute designer leaves to the vagaries of a mouse click.

The other aspect of these things that we, as designers, have to understand is the presentation layer- what the user sees- requires a design that conveys the same message we would use in a web page but in a very concise and focussed manner. There is no room for the clutter and flourishes we can add to web pages. In many respects it is much like the concept of the precis we wrote in High School English or Communication classes. Take a paragraph of a story and capture its meaning in one, short sentence. Come to think of it, there’s an app for that. My friend Hugh Elliot out of Toronto has written an app for the PlayBook called Movies in Haiku. Enter a movie title andthe 2 hours of a movie’s story are distilled down to 3 lines of Haiku.

When it comes to designing projects for connected devices, it is no longer sufficient to simply think tablets and smartphones. We, as designers, need to think a lot broader than that. A great example of this comes from none other than Samsung. They have created what they call a Smart TV which connects to the internet using WiFi. This not unsurprising. What may be surprising is the fact it is Flash-enabled ,has its own TV App store and had experienced over 2 million downloads by January of this year.

This is where the "fun" comes in.

I have been through this sort of thing before. I was the guy bringing the computers in the front door of print shops and scaring the pants off of pressmen,typesetters and strippers when desktop publishing was in its infancy. I was there when the internet evolved from the "information Superhighway" to full bore communications medium. I was there when Flash evolved from a wind up toy to today’s media powerhouse. I was there the night Macromedia asked a bunch of us Director guys to try out a thing called Afterburner which created a file called a swf which got embedded into a web page. I was at the New York Macromedia User Group the night Hillman Curtis demoed how to get video to play in Flash ( He cheated by rotoscoping) .I am not telling you this to boast or otherwise impress but to simply make it clear I have had the great fortune of being around when a lot of the stuff we take for granted today was in its infancy. In all cases where a radical technological shift occured it took a good three to four years for industry to figure out how to use this stuff and another two for common industry best practices to develop and get accepted across the board.

Not this time.

My "spidey sense" is telling me Industry will need only two years to figure it out and one more to develop the best practices and industry standards. It took a lot longer than that for the standard banner ad sizes that many of us work with to emerge. So with this compressed timeline you may be asking where’s the fun in that?

Don’t overthink it. This is one of those interesting moments in the web design universe where we get the chance to "make it up" with everbody else and to participate in the emergence of best practices and standards. That’s the fun part, Nobody really has a clue regarding what is going on which means we have a couple of years to "play" and learn along with the industry and our clients. Adobe’s CS 5.5 release of Flash,Dreamweaver and InDesign are, in essence, Adobe’s way of saying : "This is where we think this multiscreen thing is heading. Here’s a bunch of tools we think you might need. Have fun."

For me, the coolest thing in the release is the ability to create fully interactive publications using InDesign. When Martha Stewart Living and Wired use this technology to create publications aimed squarely at tablets you can’t help but get a tad excited. It’s a magazine! No, it’s an app. Whatever it is all you need is your current design skills, a coder with serious chops and a browserless network connection to create some pretty cool stuff. In the example below it is the same magazine but the presentation changes depending on whether you are reading with the iPad in a horizontal or vertical position.

In fact I am looking forward to seeing some of the cool stuff you will create . The issue,for you is, will I see it on my iPhone, iPad, Xoom, Playbook, Samsung TV, Motorola Atrix or other device? I don’t have a clue … and neither do you.

Fasten your seatbelts and let the browserless fun commence!.

Note: Want to add some source code? Type <pre><code> before it and </code></pre> after it. Find out more
  • http://logic52.com Shane

    AWESOME ARTICLE!!! Scary. But awesome.

    The industry does seem to be moving away from the browser. Where once there was issues with getting your page to render in different browsers, now there’s a similar “issue” – Preparing your page for a multitude of screen sizes. This “issue” seems to be a reoccurring one in the industry e.g. HTML emails.

    I guess your biggest strength is the ability to adapt ;).

    • http://fuseloop.com Dave Thompson

      It’ll be a while before desktop browsing becomes a thing of the past, but the technologies that developers use (HTML/CSS/JS) will likely become the de facto standard for desktop apps (just look at Windows 8!). A lot of forward-looking developers are going to sites like Fuseloop (http://fuseloop.com) in anticipation of this shift.

      • http://www.giulianoliker.com Giuliano

        Don’t spam.

  • Paul

    Right now people use browsers to search the web for information as well as businesses. If everyone switches to stand alone Apps, how will anyone find it? It seems there will always be a need for some sort of website, if only to direct customers to their App download.

  • http://- clint

    i wish i didn’t waste my time reading this article

    • andrew

      I agree, I didnt care much for the article. Seems like its the kind that is made to promote alot of buzz.

    • conor

      100% per cent agree – article was truly a waste of my time. Platform specific functions are time consuming and useless. HTML 5 solves all this. The only variable in(&on) any device is screen size. Standard set of protocols – similar to why the internet became so big initially, ya’know. How the author overlooked this is mind boggling.

      • http://www.bryanvickersband.com BryanVickersBand

        You guys are thinking from a developer/coder perspective. If you think of things from the average person’s perspective, “they only care if it works.” People want a more streamlined and intuitive feel and look to everything they do. HTML5 seems really cool to you, because you know how it works to streamline the web experience. But the average person could not care less about this, think about it. They just want a button to push for whatever it is they want to do. Navigating the internet is not naturally intuitive, some of us are much better than others at finding what we’re looking for and accomplishing our objective. But apps are universal, small children use them with ease, and they are less cluttered with superfluous content that people don’t want to see. And with mobile computing OBVIOUSLY the way of the future, who wants to open a browser on a mobile device and navigate the internet to accomplish their goals? Nobody. Make an app for what they want to do, and they’ll never type “www” again.

        • Jamie

          I think their point is that you don’t need to write a platform-specific app to achieve the same end result. The web is perfectly capable of presenting a user interface that is identical to what an “app” does.

          You are having a hard time separating the functionality from the implementation. You’re right – the end user doesn’t care how it’s done, as long as it works. So, why invest in developing and maintaining a half-dozen platform specific apps when you can do the exact same thing through the web?

          There’s no requirement for a user to type “www.anything”. Nor does the user have to be aware that what they are using is being served through a web browser. All that’s needed is for greater unification of the browser and the operating system. Google is fully aware of this (see chomebook).

          The platform on which web apps are developed is far more mature and universal than any handheld app platform. And 350,000 iPod apps or whatever is peanuts compared to the hundreds of millions of web sites, all of which run in a web browser.

          The “app” isn’t going to kill the web browser. Quite the opposite, the web browser is going to become the “app platform.” And the end user may not even realize it.

        • http://www.imaginative-design.com Ricardo Rowe-Parker

          I think the author is heavily biased against the browser for whatever reason. The thing is, that downloading an app is still a cumbersome process – more so than opening up a browser on a mobile phone and finding a website through Google or typing the URL. Besides, you cannot even download an app on the iPhone unless the user has their credit card info on file. The fact that the author would overlook this is mind-boggling.

          I am a designer, and so I am constantly evaluating the cost/benefit of designing mobile apps versus mobile sites. Apps are much more expensive to design than websites, not to mention than when I design a website that works on a mobile it will work on any mobile device; not just a particular platform.

          I have nothing against the browser. The browser is what connects us and allows for open technologies. I can design a website that can be viewed on an iPhone by using a Windows machine. But if I am going to design an iPhone app I am required to use a Mac computer.

          • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

            As much as I’d like to go along with the comments on this one, there have actually been numerous reports over the last couple of years that firmly establish the notion that mobile apps are overtaking traditional web browser usage. Case in point: http://thetechjournal.com/internet/mobile-web-vs-desktop-web.xhtml . Love the trend of hate it, the research backs up the article guys ;/

          • Jamie

            Regarding this: http://thetechjournal.com/internet/mobile-web-vs-desktop-web.xhtml .

            “Love the trend of hate it, the research backs up the article guys ;/”

            I think you need to read the article. 47% games. 32% social network. Combined 80% of all mobile app usage.

            This is a fascinating bit of research which tells us something that we all probably arleady knew: most people spend the vast majority of their time on their mobile phones playing Angry Birds and updating Facebook and Twitter.

            Now, assuming that you aren’t Twitter, Facebook, or Rovio, let’s remove them from the equation. Excluding that time, of which you’re not really concerned, you now have only the remaining 20% of app-use time. Which is 1/5 of the amount of time people spend browsing the web.

            Apparently, when people do stuff OTHER than look at facebook and twitter or play games, they are still fine with using the web.

  • http://inflagrantedelicto.memoryspiral.com/ Joseph Labrecque

    Brilliant observations!

  • http://www.infinite.net.au/ Anthony Bortolotto

    Great article but I think its more important things are moving towards one standard HTML5 and the fact I can play Angry Birds in Chrome says to me browser are here to stay, just maybe a little behind the 8 ball.

  • Olli

    I have to disagree with you a bit.. Sure apps come handy, when it comes to services the user uses on a daily basis or so. But will they overthrow browsers once and for all, maybe in most popular services such as some RSS-readers, Facebook and Twitter it is possible.

    However in less known pages, pages where people visit more randomly I doubt. Let’s say I’m trying to figure out how I’m going to spent my holiday. I won’t download multiple apps for different travel agencies. I just open my browser and start comparing pages and trying to decide which gives me the best return on investment.

    You forgot what brosers are. They are designed for browsing this infinite amount of information we have in the web. The amount of information is the one biggest strenght why internet has became so huge. It’s also the biggest weakness since there is no valid way to sort out the information (ok search engines comes as close its possible, but they’re never perfect and never will be). By giving up on browsers we can’t utilize all the information as a strenght.

    In addition producing apps is quite expensive because the same product has to be done for different platforms. Well done website will work fine in all (or atleast most) OS’s.

  • Frank

    Interesting observations but parts of this article I was just thinking: ‘what?’. So, its about the network (“stupid”), the client does not care how the project is completed and there are multiple platforms on which the project must be available.

    In my opinion the browser would be the perfect tool for delivering a project of this nature. Forget Adobe for a second, forget drawing up all new protocols – advance the browser and make it disappear, that seems like the obvious way forward. Standalone HTML5 apps, open the app and you don’t even see the browser, but its there and its cross platform and based on proven protocols. By advancing the browser you are inviting web developers to start building apps and re-thinking web development for mobile devices.

    One other thing: 21 billion apps in 2013 does not mean every living human on the planet will own 4 apps! And why does this infer that the browser is dead when you can build apps with the browser?

    I don’t think this article really lives up to the title, really what you are talking about is user experience, what is the relationship between improving user experience and killing the browser?

  • http://abrightconcept.com Gabriel

    As I see it, what you’re witnessing is the onset of the post-PC era, not the post-browser era. Why?

    Browsers will remain useful despite the growth of mobile applications because 1) it is a portal into the web and 2) it is platform agnostic.

    We still need 1) because we cannot convert every website to an app, not with the current tools. It makes far more sense for browsers to simply become better with media queries and other advancements that make responsive design easier and more reliable. That way, existing websites can accommodate mobile devices and remain 2) platform agnostic and accessible everywhere without a download from an app store. To replace the web with apps is a fundamental step backwards for our interconnectedness and would entail essentially a fragmentation of the web as we know it.

    As long as we have the web, we will have browsers. In fact, as more services, games, and software move to the web, the app trend may actually reverse. Why download angry birds when you can play it online? The ability for the web to handle applications like this is still in its infancy.

    So I find it more likely that the app model is simply replacing the old PC software model. Your software is in app form, but the web is still the web, and as long as it exists, there will be a need for the browser. Consider also that with apps that depend upon OS, the market will likely only support 1 big player, 1 smaller player, and 1 fringe player, just like the PC age with Microsoft, Apple, and Linux. The platform agnosticism and interconnectivity of the web is still useful to both end-users and developers, and cannot at this time be replaced with apps. So the browser must live on, despite the current popularity of the app-model.

  • http://www.jungledragon.com Ferdy

    I agree with @Gabriel. I think this article mixes a lot of conclusions. I don’t think browsers are coming to an end, desktop browsing, or desktops as a whole are partially coming to an end. Post PC. Even that is only partially true, and mostly only for casual users in the consumer space.

    So yes, users are increasingly going to be using mobile devices to do their thing. That does not mean that browsers come to an end. Experiences can be distributed using a native app or a web app. The capability of both platforms will converge, so that as a user you cant see the difference. Browsers will rise, not fall. It makes sense. Few have the resources to build native apps for every device type. The majority of the zillion apps available now are not native apps, they are essentially minimized web sites, something that could run in a browser just fine.

    I really don’t see how you jump from conclusion 1 (post PC) to concusion 2 (end of browser).

  • Tom Green
    Author

    All Kevin Lynch, CTO at Adobe needed was a Wifi connection to show off where some of this is going. Where it could go doesn’t involve a browser:It only needs a screen.

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20070246-264/adobe-expect-location-linked-mobile-apps/

    • DED

      Hi Tom, your article is interesting, and you certainly know your stuff. But, you are overlooking many important historical issues. The first is that marketing is a poor predictor of human behavior. It’s like those economists who tell you what they believe will happen next and in the same breath tell you that it’s only a guess. The second is that the internet originally had no browsers, it worked through applications ( apps). And that has never really gone away. Most people only know the internet through the WWW, but there have always been non browser apps for computers. And most programmers are familiar with network programming from a non-browser point of view. What you are describing is a sudden trend, but you aren’t giving any real evidence that the trend won’t shift. Citing a marketer, as I said, isn’t very convincing. Too many web developers/designer get caught up in the whole client thing in my opinion. I think it helps to remember that those same marketers predicted only 5 people would be interested in a personal computer, or that only 10 people would have a use for a mobile phone. Marketing appears to work because if you throw out enough nets you will catch fish. But that only works on the grand scale not a discrete one.
      Anyway, interesting read.
      Thanks for the article.
      DED

  • Andrea

    No, because the future apps will be based on html5 and will be web-based, so we need better and faster browsers!!

    Se what the Financial times have done to avoid the apple fee ;)
    maded an html5 app!!!

  • http://myairportsedan.com Alien

    I stopped reading 1/3 when you first said that apps are going to replace browsers. Websites and apps are created differently. HTML is 50x easier than programming any type of app. Apps will never overtake traditional websites.

    • http://www.imaginative-design.com Ricardo Rowe-Parker

      Correct. Also remember that apps need to be downloaded… after they are found! Have you tried finding an app on Android’s Marketplace? It can be a real pain. The you gotta wait for it to download, and if you have any internet connection problems the download will stall. Then you have to wait for the app to install. Then you can use the app, but will still need to go through the hassle of installing regular updates.

      And a lot of apps cost money. Look at the Monopoly game for the iPad, for example. It has terrible reviews, yet they continue to sell it. Most people report that the app performed poorly before, but then they release an update that guarantees that the app will crash every time it loads. A rip off! This experience when looking at it from a website perspective is very different – user simply goes to another web site, and no harm done.

  • http://myairportsedan.com Alien

    That’s the reason programs and websites are different. Websites mostly present info. Apps have more functions and actually process stuff. Browsers will always live. And so will apps.

  • Jack

    The browser is here to stay!
    Ok apps may be more useful for many popular services but how would we ever find these services without the browser. Imagine having to download an app everytime somebody sends you a link for content.

    • Ian Callender

      Yes, as stated earlier, the browser provides a way to freely share information. All that you need is a link from someone and you can view the content without having to download something to view the content (for example some special app for that specific content)

      I don’t think Browsers are at the end, i think basic desktop applications may be nearing an end

  • http://www.bontavlad.com Vlad

    I think we are heading to a place where it all started: at the beginning of the web where the most important thing was content.Chrome, Firefox, HTML5, flash, app, a keyboard, your middle finger, are just tools for transmiting content/information. By making data more adaptable/dynamic your are giving to the user the freedom to accees it the way he wants without any major downfalls. This forcess us to think not about our problems as designers/developers and how we could make our lives easier( should i use this prog lang, should i use html5 etc) but from our users point of view, at the end of the day his happiness matters.

  • http://www.lastrose.com LastRose

    I find it’s interesting that on the PC, Browser based applications are growing (think of CRM’s, accounting software, office suites, etc). One of the charms of browser based applications is that it is relatively browser independent, where as apps are limited by platform. That said, Apps are almost idiot proof (I guarantee you I can find an idiot who will have trouble with them), but when you want to find out more about a company or product, people are still going to go to their browser. What will the future hold? hard to say, but these are exciting times, and if you look at the progress in the last 10, 20, 50, 100 years, it’s phenomenal.

  • Matt

    This article promotes nonsense. The browser was the first web-app ever built: the one that binds them all. Without a browser, you can’t navigate the rest of the internet. And there will always be a non-appified internet, because most apply are simply dumb and will not become much smarter.

  • John

    We are moving towards a more app centered future, but the browser will never go away. The browser itself is a great app, and i would not download a app for every page i visit.

    • Ian

      Agreed

  • http://www.middlefingerindustries.ca Mordecai P. Cockburn

    Apps are good for menial tasks such as banking or something that shouldn’t require a browser; but when it comes to information, I don’t like the idea of an app controlling what I can or cannot see. I want to be able to browse all that is available. If I’m researching Google’s business ethics, I’d rather not do it through a Google app.

    With your logic, corporations who can afford to get an app developed will be the only ones controlling the information in a browserless world; which is far scarier than earlier stated.

  • Dina

    Very interesting article, I loved reading it!

  • http://www.nail.cc RustyEight

    Imagine trying to read this article in a mobile app? Yeesh.

    Apps have their place. Hell you can even get the best of both worlds by designing an app with HTML5 and CSS3. Just do yourself a favor and look at the Chromebook.

    Its a browser… that runs web based apps. Your argument is invalid.

  • Brett

    Apps are cool and I do use them a lot however the overall app experience is awful. I can’t find apps, they only offer a few seconds of my time and they are limited in information.

    If you compare that to a website, it’s easy to find websites with all the other websites as well as the search engines and social media tools out there, I typically spend a lot more time on them and they are chock full of information.

    Apps simply cannot deliver that.

    I do think that apps are a great tool and serve a lot of fantastic purposes. For example, I use the ebay app all the time, even more than the website, when browsing and looking for things to purchase but when it comes down to it. I end up back on the website to make purchases, sell items and do extensive browsing because the app can’t offer what the website can.

    Apps are a big market but I see them accompanying websites, not replacing them.

  • http://cube3.com cube3

    yep. the mobile/tablet and touch screen has changed the entire game again… its the DOS vs GUI/prepress level change again, and yes asia will continue to grow and miss the pc stage.

    one other fast change will be 3d interfaces…and AR levels of 3d added as well. MS just denounced webgl, but iot wont matter, the days of IE are numbered.

    itll take 5 years, and 10 till its obvious to all…

    but for designers and creators the issue will be ownershipmof efforts and getting paid and having any value attached to the work they do…. in overdrive.

  • Reevine

    Device specific apps are what you’re talking about here.

    I disagree with you that browsers will be eliminated because web apps are of the future. The only downside to web applications is that its network connection dependant. Networks however will evolve in time to support the bandwidth demand (but that’s an entirely subjective conversation on its own, so will not go into that).

    The reason device specific applications are not going to replace the browser is because they are not as flexible and you have to code it differently for each device. Not to mention your dependant on the hosting company (such as Apple’s App Store) and their restrictions. If you use emerging technologies that make up web applications you can have the same iPhone app feel in a web browser that you can view on any screen. With browsers technologies advancing as well, it’s only a matter of time before a browser can initially “hide” itself in the course of running a web app to give it the same feel as a native application. This is what I see as the future to ease of access to information and user interaction.

  • http://www.jatsource.com JAT Source

    Interesting articles………

  • http://Www.newsparkdesigns.com tai travis

    Clearly moving away from software has been a trend. An app is lightweight software.
    Apple is obviously threatned by websites that offer similar services as apps or they wouldn’t have blocked flash and slowed down javascript on their devices.

  • Pingback: Our favorite tweets of the week Jun 20-Jun 26, 2011 | Webdesigner Depot

  • Pingback: wp-coder.net » Our favorite tweets of the week Jun 20-Jun 26, 2011

  • Pingback: Тенденции будущего: вебсайт или приложение? | Fresh: новости мира юзабилити

  • username

    I use browser only to find information and just read it. Best case if site allow me to switch to “Reader” mode.
    No need laggy and unstable HTML5 shit, that slow down my device (phone or macbook), if i use some functional web site in browser, i do it only once, and download app immediately

    i have apps of: subway map, social networks, city maps, order ticket service, mail, translator, internet radio, internet video, wallets, games, offline readers for my favorite sites, games, image editior, magazine reader,
    Apps are more simple, much faster and

    browsers are dead, HTML5 useless waste of resources – all i need in browser is find and read,
    kill CSS, JS, jQuerry, sockets, webGL, just give me information in text, “Reader” in Safari will make it better than any web designer and developer.

    bad news is that web developers will die with browser too…

    Flash and Air is closest analog of apps in web, but Apple almost kill it.

  • username

    BTW, compare any normal standalone application with laggy AppStore HTML app in iphone.
    HTML is best for reading, apps for interacting

  • Guest

    This article is shity!! Its not possible that for every functionality an app need to be created which people can download… Its stupid… I have an iPhone, Android tablet and so on but I hate it every time when new updates need to be installed… Best thing on the internet is that its open rent a server get your stuff online and almost every device with view adjustments can access it…

    Browser is important I hope its getting even more important in future! I don’t need 100 different apps to do the task… Man this is another century we need to move forward! So my from my point of view browser is the most important if we think about multi platform dev.

    Yeah native code is also very important but in fact in the future browser may become the “operating system of the future”. They get optimized with every release and companies try to push out as much as possible…

    So native code will be mostly important on server side and additional hardware things but I don’t think that programs like calenders, writing programs need to be done in native code anymore.

    Social apps are rising WebGl + HTML5 gets lot of momentum even on mobile side. Hardware gets faster.. I think WEb technologies will fit a lot of task in the future… Very critical programs like animation, video cutting and other memory intensive programs will be done natively or via streams to home computers rendered through network power farms…

    So Conclusion: Browser is necessary (I hope even in future); To be honest when I come home first thing I do is open my browser… I have only few programs installed on my PC and Mac .. like MS office, Blender and so on… other things move to the web… and even gaming will turn to the web totally yeah freaky game graphic like today with native code can’t be expected but webgl gives us some push + nice graphic is not the mayor key success of the game its more about the idea… think about the past games looks not so rich but idea behind was really well designed…

    Thanks regards

  • Pingback: Websites R Going Places | aubconrad