Designing for the New Fold: Web Design Post Monitorism

Designing for the New Fold: Web Design Post Monitorism

This entry is part 2 of 15 in the Web Design Theory Session
« PreviousNext »

Designing for the ‘fold’ has long been a priority for many Web Designers, but with so many devices capable of displaying your website, how on earth do you know where it is? Should we be worried? This article asks how important the ‘fold’ actually is, the variables at play, changing browsing habits and what you can do about it. The Death of the Fold is upon us, at last!


The Death of the Fold

Browsing the World Wide Web is no longer a task confined to desktop computers. Mobile browsing seems to be increasing day by day and many more devices such as Internet-ready televisions are becoming readily available. Brandon first mentioned it in his big yearly webtrends post, The State of Web Design Trends: 2011 Annual Edition … “The Death of the Fold” as he called it, is at last upon us.

But what does that really mean?

Because the traditional “screen” that people view the web through has undergone an explosion of variety… we can no longer expect web-surfers to be on something close to a 19″ monitor with a resolution somewhere between 1024×768 and 1280×700. Screens nowadays come in all shapes and sizes, from iPhones (and smaller phones) to 60″ HDTVs. It’s not just resolution that can vary wildly though; the very aspect ratio of a screen (even on the same device like the iPhone) can change with the flick of the wrist. Sure, web designers will always be advised to keep the most important messages of a site near the top, but with so many new ways for web-surfers to view the web, there’s no longer a defined height for where content must be above.

Before we get ahead of ourselves though, let’s kick off this article with a trip back to the old school though…


Introduction: The Old Fold

“The ideal area to place bold introductions, essential information, enticing imagery and call to action elements is above the fold…”

If you have had any graphic design education, you will likely be familiar with the term ‘above the fold’. If not, let us take a brief moment to explain.

The term was first used in reference to traditional media, newspapers to be precise. The thinking is that newspapers are often delivered or displayed folded up and the area ‘above the fold’ will be the first that the reader sees and it is therefore a prominent and important location. Eye-catching headlines and striking imagery are often displayed to attract the reader’s attention.

The phrase was naturally transferred to the field of Web Design when it became popular in the last 90′s. It is more or less the same concept, except the area above the fold is instead the area that the user can immediately see without scrolling (not as catchy, right?). This area is the ideal area to place bold introductions, essential information, enticing imagery and call to action elements. It is also the preferred space for any advertisements.

The area above the fold is the top section of a web design that the user can immediately see without scrolling.

The importance of the area above the fold seems to be supported by the ‘five second rule’ that is commonly quoted within Web Design; which states users pass judgment on a site within the first five seconds of visiting. Usability expert Jakob Nielsen has also suggested that users spend up to 80% of their time viewing information above the fold.

The Traditional Folds on the Web
The three traditional fold-lines at 570, 590 and 600 pixels, shown overlaid on the Webdesigntuts+ website (scaled down to fit the post).

The importance of the “fold” over the past decade can not be overly emphasized in it’s historical context… Hotly contested debates were held in many design-studios and marketing agencies about where, precisely, the fold was. Large amounts of money were spent on market data to predict the optimal placement of ads, and entire designs were thrown out the window because they didn’t maximize the use of the “above the fold” space. The almighty fold, at the height of its importance, was defined as one of three horizontal lines at 570, 590 and 600 pixels.

Everything below 600 pixels was irrelevant, second-tier content… not worth the effort for a dignified web designer to concern themselves with.


Phooey.

Now, at this point some of you may be thinking, or even shouting (given the amount of debate this subject seems to cause) that the ‘fold’ is irrelevant and any discussion of it should be confined to the history books. The notion that a web designer is restrained to a small portion at the top-part of the screen is absurd. We would like to believe that all web users scroll and that we have the freedom to express ourselves and create a design in as much space as it takes. Some have even got pretty creative in demonstrating that people are willing to scroll.

Undoubtedly there has been many an argument between a web designer and their client as to the importance of the ‘fold’ and this may have contributed to the somewhat bad reputation it has. A client, overestimating the importance of the fold, may request everything and the kitchen sink to be squeezed and crammed into that relatively small space and the web designer will be left frustrated that they cannot demonstrate their skill for position, alignment and subtle use of white space.

The key to this issue, as with many other design aspects, is achieving a balance. Obviously, confining yourself to a small part of the screen would limit your creativity and design options. On the other hand, to disregard the idea of the ‘fold’ entirely would be a mistake, and you would miss out on a potentially powerful design technique as we will see below.


The Fold in Action

The beautifully crafted website for the Kaleidoscope app is an excellent example of designing with ‘the fold’ in mind. The large title, an introductory paragraph, an eye-catching image and call to action elements are all instantly visible and available to the user. Notice how supplementary information under the heading ‘Learn more’ falls beneath the cut-off point. The ‘fold’ has clearly been considered in the design of this website, yet scrolling down will reveal a vast amount of information and many more detailed design elements. It is apparent that the designers of the website still expect users to scroll.

You will find similar design patterns implemented across many large web sites. The importance of that first impression is recognised, yet a much larger area is fully utilized to tell a story and communicate the information they need to. The area ‘above the fold’ is often used to lead and guide to the user further down the page and to the areas the designer wants the user to see. It is indeed an important skill to have, to be able to grab a user’s attention, yet keep them intrigued enough to remain on the site and actually seek out new information and content.

It will always be second nature to include the key messages and call-to-action material near the top of a site design… but dogmatically trying to squeeze content above the fold is no longer a strategy that should chain down your designs.

If you visit the Kaleidoscope website for yourself however, you will more than likely be presented will a somewhat different view. You may be able to see more or less of the website – and here is the problem that faces every web designer. How can you design for the fold if you don’t know where it is for any particular visitor? There are many different factors that combine to determine the physical size of the area ‘above the fold’.


The Problem of the ‘New’ Fold

Web Designers are well used to designing with browsers in constant consideration. The many quirks and inconsistencies have frustrated us for years and they also play a role in this conundrum. Each individual browser will take up a different proportion of the screen depending on the size of the browser U.I and any additional toolbars. The trend with modern browsers does seem to be positive however as they appear to be occupying less space than previously. The developers of Google’s Chrome, Safari and Internet Explorer 9 have realised that there is a better browsing experience when there is little to distract users from the website itself.

Today, there is also such a multitude of monitor size and screen resolution combinations that it proves almost impossible for a ‘one-size fits all’ web design. Many years ago, it was established that 1024×768 was the most common screen resolution and this appears to be what most designers still design for. The resolution statistics from WebDesigntuts alone demonstrate the scale of the problem for designers.

Let’s take a quick peek at the browser resolution statistics for the Webdesigntuts+ site for a quick case study:


The resolution stats for Webdesigntuts+ reveals a much wider spectrum of resolutions than any single fold-line could ever account for.

“You can’t guarantee that they are using a traditional monitor screen at all.”

The graphic shows that there is a wide variety of resolutions currently being used with a majority of usage spread across six different sizes. As you can see the 1024×768 screen resolution now only counts for a small percentage, although this may have increased recently due to the IPad deciding to use this resolution.

If it wasn’t enough that you don’t really have an idea of what size monitor a web user had, now you can’t guarantee that they are using a traditional monitor screen at all. The age of mobile browsing is well and truly upon us and there are many different devices currently being used. Let’s revisit the analytic statistics for Webdesigntuts:

As you can see there are many different operating systems being used, and platforms such as Android can be incorporated into various devices. Tablet based browsing, which exploded with the release of the IPad, will only become more popular with the release of many different sized tablet-computers. Mobile devices of all kinds also pose a unique challenge for web designers in that they can be used in either landscape or portrait mode – a decision that would vastly change the position of the ‘fold’ line. Many websites are now making the effort to be ‘optimized’ for devices such as the Ipad.


Strategies for Designing for the New Fold

So with all of these variables, how on earth is it possible to know where the ‘fold’ is?

The truth is you can’t. With so many variables in play it is almost impossible to know exactly where the fold line will be. Fast-forward just one or two years and we’re likely to see even more changes to the screen environment. This all just means that the previous advice to design within the first 600px cannot be safely relied upon anymore. It would appear that striving for pixel perfection will only leave you frustrated.


The mobile devices breakdown for readers on Webdesigntuts.

A more sensible approach would be to design for general, ratio based folds that would take both landscape and portrait orientated browsing into consideration…

This would entail designing not only for the traditional fold, but also a second fold further down the page. Such a fold would take nothing away from a conventional design but would have an added bonus for those using mobile devices and tablet computers. By using an approximate ratio rather than relying than fixed pixel measurements, while it will be certainly less accurate, you should still be relatively safe.

We believe the key here is not to focus too much on the ‘fold’ itself, but rather attempt to keep your core message within a ‘safe zone’ while maintaining a quality design overall. Ideally you should test designs on mobile devices, but there are many simulators available if that is not always possible.

The best possible design strategies that adapt to a wide range of monitors will be those that have an established sense of hierarchy across the entire design. This means that the core message of a site should be apparent from just about any “scaling” of that site – and more detailed information and content should be readable in order of it’s importance on the page.

Other design principles like Typography, Color Theory, Layout, and Gestalt all play a huge role in this as well, so web designers would do well for themselves to polish up on these established practices. Indeed, perhaps one of the great new opportunities that the “death of the traditional fold” offers designers is a return to core design principles… leaving behind rigid, dogmatic, and nonsensical notions of layout in favor of age-old design theories.


The Bigger Picture


Data from the W3 Schools website.

“…In the study, they found that 76% of users scrolled and that a good portion of them scrolled all the way to the bottom, despite the height of the screen.”

The statistics for Webdesigntuts site alone is helpful to look at (mainly because we have such detailed data on it), but it certainly doesn’t represent the entire internet, right? Even when we look at the official browser display statistics from the W3 Schools official site, a similar trend begins to emerge.

Certainly, the data from just these two sites doesn’t represent the entirety of the internet browsing audience… but by looking at the writing on the wall, it’s easy to determine that this is not just a fringe occurrence, it’s a new pattern that’s emerging. Combine this with sales of new devices and the growth of the monitor industry, and it’s rock solid ammunition for the anyone looking to dispel the myth of the traditional fold.

Furthermore, many research studies have been conducted that debunk the importance of the fold, even back when it did exist. The conclusions: even when you do use a fixed monitor size (ie: 1024 x 768), people surfing the web not only glance below the fold… they often spend most of their time there!


Conclusion

We have discussed a lot in this article so let us round up some key points.

The traditional concept of designing for the ‘fold’ appears to be somewhat outdated when it comes to modern web design. We have seen that a combination of variables and a change in the browsing methods of many people means that a fixed position of the ‘fold’ line cannot safely be established. Web users are also very much prepared to scroll; especially with multi-touch devices such as the IPad that make the task very intuitive.

However it does not mean that the ‘fold’ should be disregarded completely. The ‘fold’ can still be an effective element in any design. There can be no doubt that first impressions do indeed count in web design and this space can be used to not only capture your audience but also lure them further down the page. Reserve this area for your most essential information while reassuring your clients that visitors will still see that paragraph on their history further down the page.

With no signs that mobile browsing is slowing, an argument can also be made for designing for a second ‘fold’ line for those browsing using a portrait-oriented device. It should not be detrimental to your design in any way and will only give those using such devices an added bonus.

What do you guys think? Do you still attempt to design for the fold? Is it a case that we designers are already aware of such changes and is it the clients that we need to educate?

This article was originally conceived by Brandon Jones, then written and researched extensively by Shaun Cronin, and finally re-written and edited with Brandon.

Shaun Cronin is kronen on Graphicriver
Note: Want to add some source code? Type <pre><code> before it and </code></pre> after it. Find out more
  • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

    I just wanted to say you rocked this article Shaun! This was a huge topic to take on… and I think you really nailed the main points. It’s quite clear that the old ‘fold’ is on the way out, and I think it means that web designers can finally stop stressing about silly invisible lines and focus on the overarching design of sites (not that designers have ever really needed someone to tell us this, but it helps when a client brings up the topic). Fantastic work bud :)

    If anyone has any questions or comments on this whole “new fold” thing, post them here and I’ll be glad to answer along with Shaun. Cheers!

  • Barry

    Just tracking the monitor size is misleading. I’ve got a pair of 1920×1200 resolution monitors but I never open up my individual web browser windows wider than 1024×768. To make them bigger is a waste of space for many sites and makes jumping between windows more difficult as there is less of each window showing.

    • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

      Heya Barry, I believe that these stats are actually based on the actual browser size… not the window size, but I’ll have to double check on that for ya ;) You make a good point that lots of people use smaller browser sizes than their monitors though ;) I’ll see if I can’t find out what the actual measurement is and report back.

      • http://www.ileanagonzalez.com Ileana

        Hi Brandon, regarding your comment ‘ I believe that these stats are actually based on the actual browser size’. I always thought that the screen resolution statistics related to the screen rather than the browser window… Did you manage to check it out?

        Regarding this same topic, I am trying to tackle another issue… Should we start designing for a width of 1280 pixels? I know a lot of users are there but I am wondering if designing wider websites is actually usable… That means users have to scan more content and text from left to right not. And then there are users like Barry who don’t even open their browser windows any larger than 1024…

        I’m throwing this out there. If anyone has an opinion or any references, please share.

        • http://adamcrooker.com AdamTheGr8

          In regards to designing sites @ a width of 1280 pixels / I would only do so if you build the site with media queries to allow flexibility for users that don’t utilize a wide amount of space for their browser. Also – to consider if you end up with a heavier emphasis on width / you must consider how this will play out on mobile devices.

          In the end its really about your target market – if the site is based for tech savvy users it would be fine. If your building a site for a retirement community – i would stick with the 960 or 1024 & build for ie7 +.

  • http://contempographicdesign.com Chris Robinson

    Great article, and I wholeheartedly agree the old “fold” is on the way out. I know a lot of the averages stated in the article are above 1024×768, but I also believe that a designer still needs to look at the resolution stats for that particular project and also consider the audience its intended for.

    • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

      “a designer still needs to look at the resolution stats for that particular project and also consider the audience its intended for.” – Great point Chris… so much of this depends on individual projects… which is part of the underlying goal of this article – to put the focus back on individual designs and projects, not arbitrary rules. Thanks for commenting!

  • http://www.parachutedesign.ca Jay

    The page fold has handcuffed web designers for as long as I can remember. Finally the general public is becoming more accepting of larger and more varied screen resolutions which ultimately gives us more freedom to create more engaging user experiences for the our intended audience. Great article, and a great day to be a web designer!

  • pixelBender67

    great article, very informative !

    What about fluid layouts ?

  • anon

    I never really look at height to be honest.

    With current technology(Android/iOS phones and tablets, fast scrolling wheels like those on the logitech MX revolution, etc…) and how widely spread it is, I just make sure it’s about 980 pixels to 1024 pixels wide or if it’s a mobile device, 100% and make sure the logo is on top. Other than that I try to keep an open mind.

    I do notice that I always put the main point(s) of the site at the top, because no matter how you turn a page or open it on whatever device, it will always begin at the top left, how high that it is is another thing so I don’t really take that into account.

    • anon

      “it will always begin at the top left”. For the people here in the west ofcourse.

  • http://www.ntouchmarketing.com Houston Web Designer

    Excellent article. With all of the new technology, and the fact that it changes on such yearly, if not sooner basis, the old rules of design are out. I think the changes will allow more designer the freedom to just design and not worry about the silly things like the fold that so many clients used to focus in on.

  • http://www.ghosthack.de Ghosthack

    Nice informative article with good illustrations.

  • http://www.hiwaar.org/vb/forum.php T Mubarak

    I found this article very usefl. thanks. As we are redesining our website!!!!

  • Wouter

    Great article!

    One thing I would like to add: I’d like to think is part of a larger story and that it pays off to have your mind set to ‘do things right’. I mean, at a certain time a lot of designers found it was O.K. to create webpages of 500kb or more, flash-heavy, optimized for 1024×768 pixels.

    But now, with the rise of netbooks, tablets, smartphones and PDA’s, things like download size, screen resolution. Screen resolutions for smartphones start at 320×240. Due to data plans, file size of your HTML, CSS and graphics is more important than ever. And the iPad doesn’t even play Flash content (as far as I know). So a lot of companies and people who invested in standards-compliant, lean websites are now reaping the rewards. And I think that’s actually really cool: being rewarded because of doing the ‘right’ thing.

    • http://webdesign.tutsplus.com/author/shaun/ Shaun Cronin
      Author

      Great comment Wouter.

      I agree with you totally. All of the time and effort to build and design valid, standards-friendly websites really does pay off in the long run!

    • http://codemonkeydev.com/ Thomas Cannon

      I think it’s great as well. I am lucky enough to have fallen off the web design bandwagon for a few years (2004-2008), because when I returned, things were actually becoming standardized. Case in Point: When I started in 2004, I didn’t even know CSS existed. But when I came back in the summer of ’08, it was one of the first languages I picked up. And with the features touted in CSS3/HTML 5, it’s only going to get better.

      That’s one of the reasons I’m so happy that the development/design community has been pushing so hard for it’s widespread knowledge, because it is only going to make our jobs easier. Theoretically, rather than having to know half a dozen things in order to be a good designer, you may only need 2-3 tools.

      Thanks for writing this tutorial, I really enjoyed reading it. It’s good to know these things when you’re trying to improve your design skills

  • http://www.aaronkato.co.uk Aaron Kato

    This article is a complete relief after many years of inappropriate content-pressing! I’m the one who’s also completely fed up with conforming himself to the stupid “fold” since I (and I think I can speak in many of my colleagues stand) love giving room, some nice free space, fresh air around the nice illustrations, the logo, the typography. Space. When you have this limitation called “fold” and all the clients are really picky on this crap so they will always want to put everything above the fold. Let it be visible.

    Nicely presented, purely organised, golden ratio, these are just words for most of them, they always want to display it above the fold… It’s coming to an end finally.

    I was so happy reading this article!

    • http://webdesign.tutsplus.com/author/shaun/ Shaun Cronin
      Author

      I’m glad that you enjoyed it Aaron!

      I hope this article proves to be a useful resource for you in case you ever attempt to educate one of your clients on why squeezing everything at the top of page simply isn’t necessary!

      I think there will always be clients who will never understand the importance of ‘white-space’ though!

  • http://hire-web-designers.co.uk allan jose

    web designing is all about evolution..the old fold is out…websites are more graphic oriented and complex…nice article..thanks.

  • Bob

    Oh my! My mouse wheel takes too much work to move. Make all your sites shorter please.

  • http://www.geolance.com Project Outsourcing

    Wow, that was a long post. This reminds me that I need to make a new 404 error page for my website. It’s interesting to see the creativity put in to things that one hopes to never see anyway.

  • John

    Ive been thinking about this lately. Mostly because most sites arent well designed for the iPhone. What are your thoughts on a different layout for when the visitor using an iPhone?

  • http://maxdegterev.name/ Max

    “Even when we look at the official browser display statistics from the W3 Schools official site, a similar trend begins to emerge.”

    Official statistics from the W3 Schools official website? Lolz! http://w3fools.com/

  • Šarūnas Savickas

    Thanks for stats!

  • http://www.webdesigndevelopers.co.nz Pen

    Thanks for sharing your research on the FOLD. Your post confirms my thoughts.

    The ‘fold’ has always been a part of my initial design process, but I no longer limit a design to 600px. What is becoming more of an an issue for me is the use of Flash, which iPhone and iPad don’t support.

    To get around this, I include a static image for those users without the Flash plugin, but more and more I avoid the use of Flash in favour of jQuery. Unfortunately the result of jQuery and WordPress websites has created a ‘me too’ look, which is hard to totally break free from.

    I miss the design freedom that Flash provided.

  • Pingback: Best of Tuts+ | January 2011 | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: Tutorialz | Copy. Share. Enjoy. » Best of Tuts+ | January 2011

  • Pingback: Tutorialz | Copy. Share. Enjoy. » Best of Tuts+ in January 2011

  • Pingback: Best of Tuts+ in January 2011 | Web-Busines.com

  • http://www.memango.se Nina

    Great article, thank you!
    “What do you guys think? Do you still attempt to design for the fold? Is it a case that we designers are already aware of such changes and is it the clients that we need to educate?”

    I always educate our clients a little bit and tell them why I do certain things in the design. To me it’s important that our clieent knows why the design looks like it does, especially if they have whishes that don’t follow standards and rules in design. The result: Happy customers and happy me! :)

    I wonder if you could write an article that explains screen resolutions in more detail? That would be great!

    Thanks for the best design education ever!

  • Pingback: Best of Tuts+ in January 2011 – Cape.de.ms!

  • Pingback: Best of Tuts+ in January 2011 | Wizpress.com

  • http://paradoxite.com Paw

    Great article, very informative. I like the whole series on Design :)

    Great work!!! Thanks

  • Pingback: After Effects Tutorials » Blog Archive » Best of Tuts+ in January 2011

  • http://graphicalinsight.com Rob

    Hi Shaun,

    Thank you for this great article. It is so concise, and complete about this whole idea. Along with many other ‘theories’. The fold, ajax vs flash vs html5, apple vs microsoft, .net vs apache, and many other debates have become so blown out of proportion.

    I am one of the techie backend guys that is try to get more exposure, and experience with web design. This article is a great help, and I appreciate the time you put into it.

    Thanks,
    Rob

  • Pingback: is there a fold? | picas to pixels

  • http://www.elite-web.co.uk/ Web design Manchester

    This is exactly what I had been looking for, Thank you

  • Catalin

    Nice article! But think outside for a moment where the design is still an issue, where users still have IE 6, where they still have 1024X768 . I tried to explain my clients the importance of the “fold” and still no result. Does this mean that we have to start to educate our clients?

    • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

      Educating our clients has always been part of our jobs… and one of the most important ones! So yes, you should absolutely be educating your clients on trends like this.

  • Pingback: How the iPad (and Tablets) Are Driving a New Age of Web Design | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: How the iPad (and Tablets) Are Driving New Web Design Trends | Shadowtek | Hosting and Design Solutions

  • CF

    None of the links to “Great Design Hurts: Striving for Pixel Perfection” are working – they all link to the Z-layout page.

    - CF

  • Pingback: How the iPad (and Tablets) Are Driving New Web Design Trends | Skippad

  • Pingback: How the iPad (and Tablets) Are Driving New Web Design Trends | Zoomfly

  • Adam

    Great article! I think the advent of mobile browsing has done wonders for dispelling the “fold” once and for all. With the reduced resolution of phone screens, users are becoming much more used to scrolling for information. However, the tradeoff is that mobile browser rendering can still be wonky at times – meaning that for all the freedom it creates, it also poses a slew of new coding and design challenges.

    Also, as others have pointed out, clients need educated on this trend. I am working on an interface for an online MBA course right now, and we’ve been chained to roughly 750×350 as our design space to accommodate netbook users. Viewing that layout on a standard widescreen monitor looks silly now because we our guidelines were to work in a fixed layout and target the smallest resolution expected. Had the client been more amenable to the trend of flexible design for multiple display types and resolutions, the interface could be much better. Ultimately, it’s the project that suffers when dogmatic, dated knowledge like fold guidelines are allowed to dictate the design.

  • Adam

    Great article! I think the advent of mobile browsing has done wonders for dispelling the “fold” once and for all. With the reduced resolution of phone screens, users are becoming much more used to scrolling for information. However, the tradeoff is that mobile browser rendering can still be wonky at times – meaning that for all the freedom it creates, it also poses a slew of new coding and design challenges.

    Also, as others have pointed out, clients need educated on this trend. I am working on an interface for an online MBA course right now, and we’ve been chained to roughly 750×350 as our design space to accommodate netbook users. Viewing that layout on a standard widescreen monitor looks silly now because our guidelines were to work in a fixed layout and target the smallest resolution expected. Had the client been more amenable to the trend of flexible design for multiple display types and resolutions, the interface could be much better. Ultimately, it’s the project that suffers when dogmatic, dated knowledge like fold guidelines are allowed to dictate the design.

  • Pingback: How the iPad (and Tablets) Are Driving New Web Design Trends | Zoombug

  • Pingback: How the iPad (and Tablets) Are Driving New Web Design Trends | Jetcat

  • Pingback: Is it better to have social media icons at top or bottom of the home page?

  • http://www.ogvidius.com/ Ogvidius

    I don’t think the fold is so important that you need to actually put a line there in your mockup and design around it. As long as you have a good visual hierarchy the fold is irrelevant. General rule of thumb: important stuff at the top (big), less important stuff below (smaller). People do scroll. Nice article!

  • http://surrendr.deviantart.com JoeyDavis

    I agree with what a few others said about how widespread the topic is. It really depends per site, so I think the following link from google labs is really halpful alongsite this article:

    http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/

  • Pingback: Designing with the grid - Markus Jönsson´s blog, Student at Hyper Island Digital Media program

  • Pingback: Future Trends: Are Browsers Becoming a Thing of the Past? | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: Future Trends: Are Browsers Becoming a Thing of the Past? | Marketing for Companies

  • Pingback: Future Trends: Are Browsers Becoming a Thing of the Past? | Jetcat

  • Pingback: Future Trends: Are Browsers Becoming a Thing of the Past? | Shadowtek | Hosting and Design Solutions

  • Pingback: My Stream » Future Trends: Are Browsers Becoming a Thing of the Past?

  • http://www.teaditionaltaps.co.uk web design

    I agree with what a few others said about how widespread the topic is. It really depends per site, so I think the following link from google labs is really halpful alongsite this article:

  • Pingback: Future Trends: Are Browsers Becoming a Thing of the Past? | All of Cyber

  • Pingback: Future Trends: Are Browsers Becoming a Thing of the Past? | Camixo

  • Pingback: Future Trends: Are Browsers Becoming a Thing of the Past? | Zoombug

  • http://www.technologygarden.biz web design

    Great article, very informative. I like the whole series on Design

    I agree with you totally. All of the time and effort to build and design valid, standards-friendly websites really does pay off in the long run! with thanks

  • http://glennfriesen.com/category/links/ Glenn Friesen

    There definitely is quite a bit of discussion on this.

    I’m surprised there isn’t equal discussion about the z-index. I guess most people still haven’t realized that the web enables that third dimension. I’m equally surprised that there isn’t as much discussion about events/animations. I guess most people still haven’t realized that the web enables that fourth dimension.

    Or perhaps people do realize that a designer could layer panes of information and graphics above the primary content of a page. Perhaps people do realize that designers can animate tons of events to occur — like owners of many flash sites did. Perhaps the folks that realized that a web designer can control these dimensions shouldn’t. For the visitor, it’s really not pleasant to have all sorts of on-page interstitials blocking the primary content. For the visitor, it’s really not pleasant to have all sorts of moving parts, changing what a user can see, or can read from one second the next (unless the visitor expects that to happen).

    In the same way, it’s NOT PLEASANT to have all the content of a page squished into the top 400px, with tons of competing calls to action. Why this isn’t obvious still baffles me. I just suppose that it’s an inherited, legacy issue which will fade away with time and persistence.

    Grazi and blessings.

  • http://golpochat.com/forum/member.php?14918-hpminireview hp mini 210 review

    I am not able to view this website correctly on firefox I think there is a problem

  • Pingback: Do you communicate “above the fold”? | Kaela Miller

  • http://startlifer.blogspot.com/ Ilya Kovalenko

    Hi! My native language is Russian, and when I read this article I can’t understand the word “fold”. Please explain, using synonyms. Thank you in advance.

  • http://www.webdesign-phoenix.us/ Web Design Phoenix

    Hi, you bring the designers into new trend. thanks for the post.

  • http://ianryde.co.uk/ web design mansfield

    An eye-opener and thought provoking article for web designers. This will certainly help many like me in pondering over the issues raised by you.

  • http://www.webdesign-newyork.us Web Design New York

    Hi,,,,
    Thanks for your wonderful article.. This is very innovative and useful for every designers

    Thanks

  • Ben Harris

    fantastic article – thanks for taking the time to write it and using some great examples

  • Kevin Aloysius

    Just gave my Web Engineering Exam.Wish I had read this post before Giving It.But Those were Conventional Usability Theories..This is Something New.

  • http://prosolz.com web design

    very nice & informative article ….

  • Pingback: The State of Web Design Trends: 2012 Annual Edition | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: The State of Web Design Trends: 2012 Annual Edition | Shadowtek | Hosting and Design Solutions

  • Pingback: My Stream » The State of Web Design Trends: 2012 Annual Edition

  • Pingback: The State of Web Design Trends: 2012 Annual Edition |

  • http://gr8xpert.com/ Webdesgining

    Your blog is very informative..

  • Pingback: The State of Web Design Trends: 2012 Annual Edition | Graphfucker

  • http://www.technologygarden.biz web designs

    Awesome articles!!!
    Hope informative…
    Those are really needed for all kinds of web designers.

  • Pingback: WordPress and Tablets: Optimising Now and Looking to the Future | Wptuts+

  • Pingback: WordPress and Tablets: Optimising Now and Looking to the Future | Wordpress Webdesigner

  • Pingback: WordPress and Tablets: Optimising Now and Looking to the Future | Shadowtek | Hosting and Design Solutions

  • Pingback: My Stream | WordPress and Tablets: Optimising Now and Looking to the Future | My Stream

  • Pingback: WordPress and Tablets: Optimising Now and Looking to the Future | How to Web

  • Pingback: 'Above the Fold' is a Myth! Designing for the Whole Page | Affiniscape Creative Services Blog

  • Pingback: WordPress and Tablets: Optimising Now and Looking to the Future | Graphfucker

  • Pingback: ‘Above the Fold’ is a Myth! Designing for the Whole Page | eng-ming.com

  • Pingback: so i have to figure out where to put a 728x90 by Rayn - Page 4 - TribalWar Forums

  • magic_al

    Great as usal!

    Link “View our entire Design Theory Library here.” is broken though.

  • Pingback: Computer | Pearltrees

  • Pingback: How the iPad (and Tablets) Are Driving New Web Design Trends « KNunez Web Design

  • Pingback: Practicing What we Preach | DNA Seattle Blog

  • Pingback: HOW THE iPAD (AND TABLETS) ARE DRIVING NEW WEB DESIGN TRENDS | TEKTON WEB DESIGN

  • Fady

    Very good article !!, i am beginning with it to my journey into web Design concepts, and i’ll read more

  • http://www.tomlebeau.com Tom

    We’re still unable to scroll modal windows on devices like the iPhone and iPad so taking into consideration the height of pop-up windows is extremely important. I’m currently designing large pop-ups for web and finding it difficult to squeeze everything in to be compatible with mobile browsers.

  • Pingback: 15 Web Design Theory You Should Learn - ReeZh Design

  • Pingback: Chamli Tennakoon » The Death of the Fold

  • http://www.usmangroup.com Derek

    Great Post! I recently wrote on this topic as well. You can check it out here

    http://www.usmangroup.com/life-beyond-the-fold-scrolling-vs-clicking/

  • JudyK

    Thank you WebDesignTuts’ers!!! By reading your articles I’m learning a tremendous amount of concepts in Web Design that are vital for a web designer and that elsewhere, I wouldn’t be able to learn since I don’t have the time or the money to go re-study or mainly update myself at the University… KEEP IT UP! ‘Cause while you grow bigger.. .I grow wiser!!! THANKS PEOPLE!!!

  • scott_mcleod

    I agree on designing down to a second fold is important and most effective.

  • Pingback: Research Page Fold | Research&Development

  • www.think-im.nl

    The second fold is absolute most effective! Thanks for writing. Greetz form Holland. http://www.think-im.nl/website-laten-maken/