Try Tuts+ Premium, Get Cash Back!
Choosing the Right Font: A Practical Guide to Typography on the Web

Choosing the Right Font: A Practical Guide to Typography on the Web

Typography is an huge field. People devote years of their lives to this ancient craft, and yet there's always something new to learn. In this article, I’ll be reviewing the major points that you should consider when selecting a typeface for a website.

Republished Tutorial

Every few weeks, we revisit some of our reader's favorite posts from throughout the history of the site. This tutorial was first published in October of 2010.


Practical Typography

When you design for the web, you have to accept that the content will change. It's simply out of the question to take the time to kern (adjust space between individual letters) each title on a huge website. In other words, you give up some control.

What I'm going to be focusing on today is practical typography. For me, this means accepting that you will never have total control over the type on your websites. Choosing a typeface, deciding on a size, these are all things we as designers have a say in. Practical typography means learning how, and more importantly why, to adjust what you do have control over. Let's get started.


Readability

What do you do with type? Read it! So why do so many websites make it so damned difficult to do just that? Be it tiny font sizes, crammed line-height, or just plain ugly fonts, it seems that a lot of sites out there are determined to not let you enjoy their content!

By making your type readable, you immediately jump ahead of at least half of the competition, which is fortunate, really, because it's not that hard!

Typefaces

When deciding what typeface to use on your website, it's important to remember: don't over think it. I know that many designers hate using Helvetica, because it is wildly overused. I agree with this, but there's one very important piece of information this statement leaves out: why. People overuse Helvetica because it's just so damn good. It fits right in with virtually every design imaginable, it works well in small, as well as huge sizes.

While it may go against your beliefs to set your type in such an abused face, if it works, then go for it.

Your body copy is arguably the part of your design that needs to be most readable, so make sure you pick a font that works well in small sizes. What do I mean by that? If you can set your copy to 10px and you can still make out what it says, then that's a good indication you've chosen a readable typeface.

That covers body copy, but what about titles?

Readability in large titles is far easier to figure out than in body copy. If you can make out what it says immediately, then it's readable enough.

What's good about typefaces is that once you've worked on enough projects, you'll have a good idea of what works and what doesn't. From there, you'll be in a better position to make critical choices about fonts.

There's no formula for choosing the right fonts for your website. Often, the best way to decide on one is to just try out each font you think might work, and then compare. Choosing fonts is really a gut instinct, but it's important to remember that 90% of the time, a user won't be thinking about what font is used, so if it's readable, then that's often good enough.

Pairing

There's rarely (if ever) a situation where just one typeface is appropriate for use on a site. The average website has a lot of text. There's no way one typeface will work for all of them! The vast majority of well-designed websites use two typefaces: one for body copy, and one for headlines.

When choosing a pair of fonts, the most important thing to consider is how they work together. “Are they similar enough?” “Too similar?” “Not different enough?” All these are questions you should be asking yourself. I find that the best way to choose a pair of fonts that works is to just put a lot of them side by side and decide on the best. There's no way to know which is the best until you've tried all of them.

Sometimes, the most appropriate thing would be two sans-serifs, while other times, you want a sans for headlines, and a serif for body copy. It doesn't particularly matter if they look similar, what matters is if they act similar. This of course depends on the rest of your design. Whichever fonts you choose has to convey your message strongly, and if that means having contrasting typefaces, then go for it.

Simon Collison uses font pairing excellently on his site, choosing a strong sans-serif for main titles, and a simple Serif for the other, smaller headlines, as well as copy. This partnership expertly displays the message that the website is trying to say, in a way that each font individually could not express.

Size

As a general rule, designers like to set their body copy at the very least at 12px. Most, however, chose a larger size like 14px, which is even better for readability. Font-sizing is really quite easy to decide on for body copy, but it's the titles that start to get complicated.

How big should your titles be? It depends. In my observation and creation of websites, I've come to the conclusion that a title should only be as big as it needs to be. This means that you should try out different sizes until you find one that is just big enough to draw the attention you want to it, but no bigger, unless huge text is what you're going for, in which case go right on ahead.

Hierarchy

The nature of a title is big. It's an important item on the page, so naturally it should be bigger, right? Yes and no. Yes, titles are generally bigger than other elements, but no, this is not the only way to draw attention to them. Color, weight, and placement are all equally important to establishing a clear visual hierarchy to your pages.

The key point to remember about visual hierarchy is that it's all relative. Text on your site only has to stand out compared to the other text on your site. Take Wilson Miner's site for example. His titles are quite small for how important they are, and are surprisingly close in size. However, his use of color distinguishes the most important title, and gives them more meaning.

The use of type is a very important tool to establishing visual hierarchy, be it through size, color, weight, or even placement.

Leading

Leading, or the space between lines of text, is an invaluable tool for readable text. Bad leading can ruin an otherwise stellar piece of copy, and good leading can make even the worst type look readable. Fortunately, it's not that complicated to implement.

Using the CSS line-height property, you can easily assign space between your lines of copy. Generally speaking, for large blocks of text, 1.5 times the size of the text is a good size. Smaller text should have tighter leading, and huge text should have a lot. It's not that complicated, really.

Tracking

Tracking is the space between characters in text. I'll admit, this one's a bit of a grey area when it comes to “Practical Typography,” in that CSS doesn't give us huge control over it. Usually, you won't have to worry about it for small text, it's only for titles that it becomes an issue. Generally speaking, adding letter-spacing: 1px; or letter-spacing: 2px; to your CSS should be enough space between the letters.

Another place it would be beneficial to add tracking to is small-caps. Here it's generally considered good practice to add an extra pixel or two between the characters, as they naturally appear larger.

Color

While not strictly-speaking typography, color is a very important part of every website's type. I'm not talking about color schemes, but rather about the contrast needed to insure readability on your site. Black text on a white background (or light background) is widely considered to be the most readable color for text.

I'm not saying you should go and set everything to black-on-white, just that when you're designing, you should be aware of the contrast of your text. It could come back to bite you if you're not careful.

The Grid

In my opinion, use of the grid is the most important idea for practical typography on the web. You can have great fonts, spacing, and colors, but if you don't have a good layout, you may as well be using comic sans.

Using a grid when you're designing with type provides a clear balance and geometric structure to your design. It isn't the magic fix to a bad design, but if you design with a grid from the start, you can be sure that at the very least, your layout will be solid.

So what does a grid have to do with typography? Put simply: everything. The grid embodies all the fundamental ideals of typography. It's geometric, consistent, usable, and above all: beautiful.

Setting your text with a grid is a key way of establishing visual hierarchy, and it's a great indicator of how large (or small) your text should be.


Standing Out

As I said before, if you're typography is readable, then you're already ahead of 50% of the competition, so what about the other half? If you've made it this far, then together we leave the clear, consistent rules of readability and enter the murky and mysterious world of being unique.

Fonts

You want your website to stand out? Step 1. Employ some unique typography. Presumably for you this means to use some unique fonts. But what makes a unique font? For me, it's not one that isn't used often, but one that has a message or feeling not employed by other faces.

Choosing a unique font is really about the feeling. Does this font feel different? Or does it just look different? When choosing typefaces for any projects, you should always be considering the feeling of the design. As this is totally a personal opinion, I can't help you find a unique typeface. What I can do is show an example of unique fonts.

The Design Cubicle has a very unique logo and design. It's strong yet classy, attention-grabbing yet subtle. When I look at its design, the feeling of class just oozes out of the site. It says, “I know what I'm doing.”

Be Unorthodox

How many websites do you know whose logo is as big as the content? What about an ultra-thin title? Unlike my last point, being unorthodox is about seeing what others are doing, and then doing the opposite.

The folks at Savvy Belfast are smart. They noticed the cramped look of most websites, and decided to replace all that meaningless copy with one statement.

Even if you visit their site for only a moment, you can't help but remember their name.

Match Your Design

Typography is not it's own thing. It's a part of web design just like any other. Type is important, yes, but you shouldn't forget that is is just part of what makes a web design great. You should design your type with the rest of your design in mind.

If you use a highly elaborate background texture, then maybe a nice serif would be good for your titles.

My point here is simple: Don't forget the context. Design is a huge field, and today I'm just talking about one part of it. For a successful website design, all the parts have to mesh together successful. That's the goal: to craft the experience that somebody will have on your website. You can't do that with just type, or just color, or even just content!

Emotional Type

So much of an experience is defined by how you feel: happy, sad, amused, angry, blah blah blah. Humans have a wide range of emotions, and as designers, it's our job to evoke these emotions with our designs.

Of all the things I've talked about today, this is by far the most abstract, and it's a little hard to explain. Instead of trying to explain this to you, let me show you.

When I first visited Solid Giant, I smiled. I smiled the next time I saw it, and even the next time. Immediately I felt a kinship towards the design. That big, fuzzy “G” is just too adorable to forget!

Quite frankly, I think it's genius.

There's no way to teach emotional design, it's something you have to experience, and then play with in your own designs.


Practical Typography

Well, you've reached the end of the post. I hope that at the very least you've learned something, but if not, that's fine too. If there's one think I want to leave you with after reading this, it's that above all: be readable. The rest will follow.

What do you think the most important part of typography on the web is? Leave your opinion in the comments!


Also on Tuts+

Note: Want to add some source code? Type <pre><code> before it and </code></pre> after it. Find out more
  • Sacha Cohen

    This is great! Really well thought out, and I think everyone is going to learn something from it. Thanks a bunch!

    • http://webdesign.tutsplus.com Brandon Jones

      Thanks Sacha – glad you like it!

    • Brent

      Borat, is that you?

      • Anon

        Ha ha!

  • http://twitter.com/realtoughcookie Anthony Cook

    Personally i like the following for blocks and paragraphs of text:

    font-family: helvetica, arial sans-serif;
    font-size:14px;
    line-height:1.5;
    color:#2b2b2b;

    • w1sh

      Please stop leading with Helvetica. Us Windows users (majority) render it poorly (seriously look into it). Lead with Arial, then Helvetica.

      It’s such a trend too. Apple users get a great rendering but we get left with illegible type.

      • ByAMaC

        Now what have we learned from this.

      • http://austincondiff.com Austin

        font: normal normal normal 14px/1.6 sans-serif; color:#444; =)

        Using sans-serif only defaults to Arial on Windows and Helvetica on Mac.

      • ralf

        You should not use Helvetica for Body Text because it is a static Font. It is not the the best for readability. If you use Helvetica just because it is not Arial, it’s not really a design choice. They are so similar that it really makes not that much of a difference in small Sizes on Screen. Plus Helvetica is everywhere, and the first choice if you have no clue or don’t have the time to think about what works. It’s a shame how such a beautiful Typeface makes you think “cheap” when you see it nowadays.

        Google Webfonts offers a Handful of nice readable Typefaces, like droid sans. Large x-height, open letterforms, dynamic.

        I know it is hard, but a great start for non-typographers is this article:
        http://www.design-by-izo.com/2011/10/18/what-should-i-look-for-in-a-ui-typeface/

        The Books “thinking with type” and “Letter Fountain” are great for beginners too.

    • adrian

      I usually don’t list Arial before sans-serif because Arial is such an ugly font, and most of the time sans-serif is Arial anyway, but you can hope that the user set something a bit prettier than Arial as their default sans-serif font, and if they set something uglier, *they* at least like the font they chose. If you’re worried about Helvetica not rendering well on windows, replace helvetica with “Helvetica Neue” which is even nicer and comes bundled with mac but not windows.

      Also, I don’t think you need to worry about Helvetica not rendering properly on windows, because users have to install it separately, and users who are willing to do that are probably willing to use cleartype font smoothing, in which case it renders properly.

      • http://mustafanamoglu.com Mustafa Namoglu

        I agree with him. You can write Helvetica before Arial. Best choice would be Helvetica Neue, i think.

    • Developer X

      Helvetica I feel is riding some type of graphic design mac hype train. It is a very good font but i wonder if it isnt getting more credit then it deserves. Usually i see people say they use it for their font choice because they think it looks better then others, but never do they say why. which i find to be the default answer for sheep.

      one thing i dont like about helvetica is that I prefer the other version of “g” i believe it to allow for quicker reading of text but at the same time it sometimes feels out of place in some sans-serif. I also like a little bit of a hairline that i dont find i most sans-serifs I think it makes for a more elegant “o”. Something else i dont like about most sans-serifs is they dont have much of a swash on the descenders especially the “q”. i dont know why but i really want one there. I also prefer a slightly higher ascender which helvetica doesnt supply.

      I maybe wrong in my terminology and font theory i am not a font expert.

  • http://www.andrewdotson.com Andrew

    Great article! Really enjoying this new tuts site!

    • w1sh

      Love your work man.

    • http://webdesign.tutsplus.com Brandon Jones

      Thanks! We’re glad to hear that – Max did a great job on this article.

  • http://hanabiwebservices.com/ Angela

    Thank you! Being more of a developer typography is something I’ll admit I’ve struggled with a bit in the past. All your tips and reminders are a big help.

  • http://www.mybrainart.com Vasjen Katro

    Great one!! ;)

  • http://www.nunomedia.com Nuno

    Nice article. I love typography but there is something that I can find a way to understand how it works. In a lot of blogs, the headings have a white or grey line under every letter giving a very nice effect (the line is very small, sometimes is difficult to see) . Does anybody now how this is done?

    • http://www.terencedevine.com/ Terence

      in photoshop its just a drop shadow, in css it is p {text-shadow: 1px 1px 1px #ffffff;}

      thats just an example, but the first two numbers are how far the shadow is moved left or right, and up or down, the third number is how much blur you want on it, and the hex value is the color of the shadow.

    • blahblah

      do you mean something like: heading {border-bottom:color solid 1px} ?

      • Lauren

        Actually on darker bkgs I have been doing it with a background image x-repeat and padding… this way I can create the 2 color ‘imprinted’ look to the bottom border and setting it as a class to a heading. Seems to work pretty well, and I can quickly update the look cross the site :)

  • http://www.thelala365.com Lala

    Choosing the right combination of typefaces and then utilizing them properly is where I usually falter. This article has perfect timing as I’m in the process of redesigning my blog and I really want to step out of the Arial / Helvetica safe-zone this time! Thanks for the tips!

  • Ciwan

    Very Helpful, learned a lot from it.

    Thank You.

  • Sanchit

    Great Article :) !

  • http://www.ecustom.ca/ Damon Bridges

    Lovel post, definitely going to implement this into some of my stock designs.

    Thanks so much!

  • http://www.diegomonzon.com Diego Monzon

    Great article Max !!!

  • http://19fdesign.com zoel

    Good article but how about brand typo?

  • http://holamiamor.tistory.com Irene

    Goooooood job :)

    • http://www.google.com/ Zeal

      Ecmonoies are in dire straits, but I can count on this!

  • http://elainevellacatalano.com Elaine

    Very inspirational, thank you :)

  • Stephen

    Webdesigntuts+ is doing a great job already!

  • http://www.webdesignkc.co.uk/ Rory

    Quality article – You are the bEST!

  • http://www.shiftedwork.de/blog Daniel S

    Nice Roundup and well explained. Greetings from Germany :)

  • http://www.subooa.com.au Chris Duell

    I recall reading a while back that where possible, for readability serif should be used for hard copy and sans-serif for online / screen reading. It was backed up with research and the lot, and I can’t for the life of me find it now!
    Would have made this comment so much more valuable…

  • Mohamed

    MAN you are the best

  • http://www.philohermans.com Philo Hermans

    Great article and well written! :)

  • Karl Macklin

    What about kerning?

    The people must know about kerning!

    I don’t know about kerning! At least not much…

    • DaveG

      The point about no kerning is ‘PRACTICAL’ web design, meaning if you are changing content daily you may not have the time to cherry pick and kern every letter. Should a good graphic designer kern the title, sure…but it is not always practical. Myself, I would kern titles and such, but not the body if I was updating a site daily.

      • http://appventure.de Rocco

        I wish i would know what you mean with “kerning titles”

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerning

        AFAIK
        typedesigners are faced with kerning issues, a web designer can only choose the method of kerning in PS which is only a choice between the kerning implemented in your typeface natively unless the tyeface has one
        or the “machine – like” kerning method photoshop. last one is not really recommended from my site.
        However in the interwebs there is no choice of kerning only the typeface you are using has kerning pairs implemented. and thats good

        • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

          Hi Rocco! That’s actually not true – you can kern via the CSS property “letter-spacing” on the web… and most font-replacement technologies will recognize this to some degree as well. You can even include “tracking” via the “word-spacing” property.

          Hope that helps clarify!

          • http://appventure.de Rocco

            I think the letter spacing (tracking) is not the same as kerning, as you can read in the wiki article.
            “While tracking increases the space between characters EVENLY, regardless of the characters, kerning increases the space based on specific character pairs.”

            For Example:
            A and V

            Hope that helps clarify, too. :)

  • Phi

    Very useful article, thanks :)

  • http://www.eyeon-design.com Brett

    I like this. It’s a nice look at the details in web design and not just an overall “hey let’s learn how to make a website in photoshop!” All of this stuff is super important when designing a site, especially since websites are primarily typography…knowing how to do it properly can be the difference between a good site and a great site.

    Nice article :)

  • http://orkcreation.fr Romain Gerardin

    Nice article.
    From France.

  • http://cippodesign.com Cippo

    I have to grid my next designs, for sure.

  • FG

    Well done, zippy.

  • http://www.webfreelancer.net.au Chris

    Nice article some helpful tips in there.

    When it comes to using ‘unique’ fonts on the web, what’s the best solution in terms of plug-ins so they display on everyone’s browser correctly? In the past I’ve used cufon, which works well but is there anything free or that i can pay for that is secure from others stealing paid fonts for example?

    • http://webdesign.tutsplus.com Brandon Jones

      Hi Chris,

      I’m hoping to actually have an article on this in the future – I personally am a big fan of Cufon because of the clear licensing rules. Lots of folks like @font-face, but it tends to render out without anti-aliasing on PC based computers, which is grainy and ugly. The other alternative that’s been popular lately is TypeKit, which I’ve used in the past (it’s great!), but works best for one-off sites (perfect for client projects, not for templates that you might want to distribute or sell). Anyways, we’ll definitely try to cover this in depth in the future.

      Cheers!

      • http://www.webfreelancer.net.au Chris

        Cool, I’ll check out TypeKit on my next client project.

        Thanks Brandon

        • Haze Long

          For me I use the WordPress CMS and they have a free plugin for that called ttf titles. They generate png files with/without background and with a a choice of soft shadow. The good thing is the text is still there, works for SEO. Downside is they only works for a few tags in wordpress. :)

  • BuddahBoy

    Another excellent resource in the family – thanx!

  • http://www.safarista.com Kertu Kelem

    Nice article, thanks for sharing inspirational usages of typography, would be great if all the sample pictures were linking to actual sites, to view how they display there. Greets from UK!

    • http://www.safarista.com Kertu Kelem

      Was asking for links, as this is a general practice when you use someone’s design on the web, even as a sample in a tutorial, to give a referral of where you got it from. It’s just fair for the designers to know as well, that they are mentioned in the article :) (specially as this is a site that many people read :))

  • Matt

    Great post. Also worth noting is “text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;”:

    http://www.aestheticallyloyal.com/public/optimize-legibility/

    • http://www.webfreelancer.net.au Chris

      Nice tip, I’ll be utilising this for sure

    • http://jenswebstek.nl Jenski

      awesome tip tnx!

      ps. anyone up for more than :first-letter?

  • http://www.nevereon.net Gabe

    Loved this post! I’m a sucker for typography posts because it’s such a beautiful yet overlooked aspect of design. I would have loved to know what fonts were used in the example pictures however. I guess I could just scout out the URLS and check the source code, but it’s kinda a hassle. For future typography tuts I suggest you include them under the pics. I’m sure I’m not the only one who is curious :)

    Keep the good articles up!

    • http://www.maiconweb.com Maicon Sobczak

      I agree with Gabe.

  • http://www.nelutu.info Nelutu

    Thanks, one retweet from me :)

  • http://www.pixelarama.com Pierre

    Excellent addition to tutsplus. This new web design section has some killer articles. Well done!

  • Rony Biram

    Awesome article. I am really loving this new webdesign section of tutsplus!

  • http://none Rafael

    Amazing article!
    cheers from Brazil

  • http://www.motion-effect.no Johnny/NO

    Really nice reading. I have been needing some more knowing about this for a long time. I’m wondering about another thing too, having to do with titles. One WordPress template I was working on used a Javascript function for rendering a attached font type for all H3/H4 headings. How about that?

    Thanks again!

  • Eric

    I’m curious about when to use pt vs em. I’ve heard the argument for both go back and forth and was wondering when each is appropriate.

  • Mutahhar Mustafa

    Gr8 Article ! Really easy and explanatory .Just a typo in the end “think” it should be “thing” i think!

    • http://themeforest.net/user/epicera/portfolio?ref=epicera Brandon Jones

      Thanks Mutahhar!

  • http://www.hellogriff.com Nottingham graphic design

    Great article. Really useful tips. The advice here is explained simply and concisely.

  • Pingback: Review: iFontMaker for the iPad | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: Review: iFontMaker for the iPad | cssWOW:: CSS Gallery

  • Dare

    Black text on white tends to burn the eyes after a while. I find that using shades of grey is much more comfortable for long reads.

    • http://willboling.com/blog Will

      Agreed! Great article, by the way!

  • http://menian.eu/ Yasen Vasilev

    Times new Roman rulezzz!!! (*:
    Thanks for writing that article for us. It was nice revision of old knowledge, for me.
    I think I can add a bit of tips on readability: use more bullet lists (or any lists), sub headers, more paragraphs, italic, bold for keywords. I love it when there are few sub headers on an article. You can scan in a minute the main points, after that check the keywords and you already know if it’s worth it reading it.

  • http://www.shareworld.co.uk david silvester

    Great article – typography is one of many things that I struggle with (Being more a developer than a designer), this article is definitely getting bookmarked for reference. Thanks!

  • Anish Jacob

    Nice Article! Thanks from India!

  • http://www.designtank.ws Chris Raymond

    It is good to see a piece on typography and its central importance in usability. This is a good piece.

    But I have to take exception to two pieces of advice.

    1. Your example of letter-spacing shows way too much kerning between letters. We read words when they can be easily seen as a unit. When the spaces between letters get as large as your third example, the word is no longer easily read as a unit; in fact, the spaces between letters are now nearly as much as the space between words. Not good. If you set a lengthy head in all caps, then maybe letter-spacing of .025em might work, but your example is too loosely tracked for good legibility. But for a large headline, of say 30px or larger, if anything, I’d track it in. These are very common, standard practices in the world of print design, and they apply here, too, IMO.

    2. Regarding line-height: You argue that the larger the font-size, the more leading you need. Not really a rule outside of large blocks of text. If you gave 36px headlines 48px line-height, and the headline was more than one line, there would be too much leading. A better rule to on line-height for body copy is that the longer your “measure” (the width of the div holding the text), the more line-height you need to enable the eye to easily follow a long line of text and drop down to the next line. Given how common wide text divs are (with more than 65 or 70 characters, including spaces), and the use of sans-serif type at 10 or 11 or even 12px, I recommend 1.75, not 1.5 for a unitless line-height.

  • http://gnubyexample.blogspot.com Gary

    Hey by leading with sans-serif, you give users of every platform, the opportunity for their browser to make a good choice.

    My default font in Firefox on Linux is set to ‘serif’ and the article above renders excellently.

    Here ( http://is.gd/gCNMt ) is a posting that gives designers a quick look at three of the likely equivalent fonts, that Linux folks will have on their system.
    http://gnubyexample.blogspot.com/2010/08/without-flair-safe-computer-use-means.html

    I have not had a look at the css in your “Practical Guide to Typography…” post in detail, but whatever the css says, it renders nice and readable on my screen here :)

  • http://solidpitch.com Dragos

    This website uses Arial and I like the look of it. I usually do Arial, Helvetica, sans…14px+

  • http://www.y-4design.com/me/ mohammed hasan

    Great work ..
    thank you very much

  • bellarush

    There is an excellent book just published on fonts and the history thereof:

    ‘Just My Type’ by Simon Garfield.

    I hadn’t known about the history of Comic Sans, nor of Steve Jobs designed fonts all named for cities (Toronto, Chicago,) seldom seen these days.

    Fonts — more properly typefaces — seem to come and go in popularity.

  • Pingback: 用css3创建大型的下拉菜单 | Design lol 全球设计精华分享

  • Pingback: 10 Examples of Inspirational Typography on the Web (and why they work so well) | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: Best of Tuts+ – October 2010

  • Pingback: 如何选用合适的字体——web实用排版术指南 | Design lol 全球设计精华分享

  • Pingback: Web Typography: 100 Educational Resources, Tools and Techniques - Smashing Magazine

  • Pingback: Web Typography: 100 Educational Resources, Tools and Techniques - Smashing Magazine

  • Pingback: Web Typography: Educational Resources, Tools and Techniques | Wallace Goh Blogs

  • Pingback: Web Typography: Educational Resources, Tools and Techniques

  • Pingback: Dagens länkar erikgmpantzar

  • Pingback: Chris Graham – Web Typography: Educational Resources, Tools and Techniques

  • Pingback: Little Web Geek | Web Typography: Educational Resources, Tools and Techniques

  • Pingback: Web Typography: Resources, Tools & Techniques « The Creative Portfolio of Mark-Anthony

  • http://mokshasolutions.com/ Moksha

    thanks for such a wonderful article

    I came to this site just coz of the quiz. and found its very good.

  • http://www.sj777.in SJ……(sujith)

    umm……..excellnt.

    • boxofdreams

      +1

  • Pingback: Веб-типографика: образовательные ресурсы, инструменты и техники на сайте justnotes.ru

  • Pingback: Choosing the Right Font: A Practical Guide to Typography on the Web | Free Portfolio Templates

  • http://www.yourlocaltechsupport.com Rick Dettwyler

    Is it me or isn’t it time that those who write should actually proofread their copy? How does one expect to be considered authoritative if the text is poorly written or badly presented? Here are two examples:

    Let's get started.

    Really? Is it so difficult to code an apostrophe? The entire article is littered with them and it makes for a horrible reading experience.

    “Tracking. Another place it would be beneficial to add tracking to is small-caps….”

    and the example of the three “tracking” with different tracking would be helpful if you actually used small-caps!

    The intention is good but the execution is not.

    • http://www.shaneparkerphoto.com Shane Parker

      “How does one expect to be considered authoritative if the text is poorly written or badly presented? ”

      Really? How can a web developer be considered an authority with good ideas and instruction if he is not an expert in the field of spelling and grammar? C’mon man. It’s one thing if an article is horribly written from beginning to end, it’s another if there are a few issues here and there. I’d recommend trying to focus on the content rather than the few spelling and grammar mistakes here and there.

  • http://www.webdesignkc.co.uk/ Barney

    Lovely article well written and informative.
    I think the overal tip thats jumping out at me is Readability. As a designer I have fallen into the trap of ‘designing’ the text; tight letter spacing, small fonts yada yada yada. But in the end if the text is hard to read I’ve failed in my job. Content is so important on the web its Readability HAS to be made clear.

  • Pingback: Techdoom Reports » Choosing the Right Font

  • Pingback: Eternal Return » Choosing the Right Font: A Practical Guide to Typography on the Web | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: Tips: Choosing fonts for your website « LS Media Ltd - Freelance PR Consultant

  • Pingback: Designing In-Browser: A Manifesto | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: Designing In-Browser: A Manifesto | Shadowtek | Hosting and Design Solutions

  • Pingback: Web Design Foundations

  • Pingback: Designing In-Browser: A Manifesto | Jetcat

  • Pingback: Designing In-Browser: A Manifesto | Bubbleworks

  • Pingback: Designing In-Browser: A Manifesto | Zoomfly

  • Pingback: Web Typography: 100 Educational Resources, Tools and Techniques : Copy & Print Center

  • http://none (aleb

    With Google font api embedding, it’s gotten a whole lot easier. But great article!

  • junaid

    gret

  • http://www.microglobe.co.uk/catalog/index.php?cName=lenses Nikon lenses

    Great website . it is exactly what i was searching online . i really appreciate this effort !

  • http://titan-creative.net S3bY

    Great post! When designing for the web, I always find choosing the fonts the hardest part!

  • http://www.websheen.com Karmel

    I find, in some cases, type to be much more important than the other elements of design.
    To approach choosing a font, generally I try to envisage how my audience will react to the text, what mood it sets off, what the font was originally intended for, as well as it’s aesthetics appeal to the target audience.
    A very well put article.

    Many thanks.

  • Pingback: Choosing the Right Font: A Practical Guide to Typography on the Web | Shadowtek | Hosting and Design Solutions

  • Ithi

    Its just great! Thank You for this post a lot to learn from here. I wondering what font is used in “Leading” image.

  • http://lublin-fotografia-slubna.pl Fotografia Ślubna Lublin

    great post, interesting examples … I’ve learnt something: I haven’t paid enough attention to typography when designing my website :) thank you for this article!

  • imoddesign

    Thank

  • Pingback: Choosing the Right Font: A Practical Guide… | MarzDev

  • Alexander Hultner

    Great examples. Great typography is finally realistic for the web and I love it. I really hope that we will see more off it in the future. I noticed that a newspaper started using some really nice typography the other day and it really does a lot, gives the whole site and article content a more newspaperish feel.

  • Pingback: Tweet-Parade (no.47 Nov 2011) | gonzoblog.nl

  • Pingback: Our favorite tweets of the week Nov 21-Nov 27, 2011 | linuxin.ro

  • Pingback: My Stream » Best of Tuts+ – October

  • Pingback: Web Typography: Educational Resources, Tools and Techniques | all posts

  • Pingback: Easy Tech Club

  • Pingback: Design a Clean e-Commerce Website Interface in Photoshop | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: Design a Clean e-Commerce Website Interface in Photoshop |

  • Pingback: Design a Clean e-Commerce Website Interface in Photoshop | Graphfucker

  • Pingback: My Stream | Design a Clean e-Commerce Website Interface in Photoshop | My Stream

  • Pingback: Design a Clean e-Commerce Website Interface in Photoshop | GMancer

  • Pingback: Design a Professional Blog Layout in Photoshop | Webdesigntuts+

  • live in nanny rates

    Ok so I am thinking about removing my blog from Tumbler and get it to a WordPress site. I believe this is a wordpress blog right? If it is, may I ask where you got the theme? Thanks a bunch!

  • Pingback: 爱译者 | 设计一款黑色风格的博客皮肤

  • Pingback: 阅读 : 选择合适字体:Web排版实用指南 | 【善忘技术夹】- 分享开发经验|开发技巧|开发生活

  • Pingback: Choosing the Appropriate Typeface for your Projects | SmokingDesigners | Graphic Design Fashion and Photography

  • Pingback: Designing a Logo | Native

  • Pingback: Typografi på nettet | Victor Vikene

  • Pingback: 5 Essential Elements of a Great Blog Design

  • Pingback: Continuum Web Design Blog

  • Pingback: My Stream | Style Tiles: An Alternative to Full Design Comps | My Stream

  • Pingback: Style Tiles: An Alternative to Full Design Comps | Webdesigntuts+

  • Pingback: Product – Designing a Logo | BaseCloud

  • Pingback: Designing for the Web | BaseCloud

  • Pingback: 如何选用合适的字体——web实用排版术指南 | 技巧

  • Pingback: Designing a Logo | BaseCloud

  • Pingback: Why Typography and Fonts Are Important — Amped Style

  • Pingback: Создаем «чистый» интерфейс коммерческого вебсайта в Photoshop’е.

  • Ann mathew

    Great .. Thank you very much

  • http://twitter.com/garrypeace Garry Peace

    Great article, thank you.

    I would recommend (Smashing eBook) Getting the Hang of Web Typography, to everyone who has read this.

    :]

  • Pingback: Fonts | briancreyes.com

  • Pingback: Links of the Day 12/23/2012 | Buzu’s Oficial Blog

  • Pingback: 12 Best High Quality and Free Fonts of 2012 - DesignRapid.com

  • Pingback: Most Influential Fonts in Graphic Design and Their History

  • http://twitter.com/mrtnlrssn Martin Larsson

    “if you’re typography is readable” —> “if your typography is readable”

    Otherwise, great article!

  • Pingback: Wiki Walk Wednesdays: No. 4 | The Nostalgia Machine

  • Pingback: Best of Tuts+ in October | Envato Notes

  • Pingback: Improve Website Readability By Using Better Typography | Online Money Income